OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
120702242 over 3 years ago

I understand your choice on way/614041681, in terms of the others I understand the rush of time, but it would be useful for others using osm to be a little more careful or hesitant before deletions in future

120702242 over 3 years ago

A lot of unnecessarily deleting the information from ways, changing them into lines and turning them into single line relations:
eg.
way/428539818
way/614041681
way/561380101
A lot of deletion of power plants instead of editing them:
way/483686440/history
way/322047421/history
way/132503210/history
There are many other examples.
I think it would be a better practise to edit the information that is there rather than to delete and redo. that way the history of the object is preserved.

120702242 over 3 years ago

Hi, I noticed that you have deleted a lot of valid power plant annotations recently, either by removing information from the ways, turning them into lines and creating single-object relations to the lines or by deleting the ways and replacing them with new ways with different/missing information. What is the rationale behind doing this? I think better practice is to edit existing structures to add additional information rather than deleting them completely.

107264339 over 4 years ago

sorry wrong link : man_made=chimney

93493698 over 4 years ago

My mistake, I was new to OSM then. I am participating in organised editing on behalf of climate trace an ngo dealing with climate change issues:

osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Climate_TRACE

104680456 over 4 years ago

I've reverted the change

104680456 over 4 years ago

My mistake, I didn't see that there was a good way covering the whole thing.