Hi karsonkevin2. Thanks for taking the time to reach out and for the constructive notes. I'm a sporadic user on this platform, so I apologize for any norm violations I may have made, and I'll make sure to do better in the future. No obligation, but I have a couple questions.

Re: your comments.
1. To clarify, is the gist that the default satellite imagery on the editor is not necessarily accurate, and it's inappropriate to base your edits purely on that imagery? I see you mention other imagery, GPX traces, and other features, is there a standard mechanism by which to verify I'm using accurate information? Or is that something I need to do my due diligence on every time?

2. I didn't know that, thank you for sharing, though I should have realized that for square buildings I shouldn't just eyeball it. For buildings that have a combination of squared and rounded sides, is there a means by which to square the square parts without disrupting the non-square components?

3. Your point about using winter imagery is well taken, though to be a tiny bit defensive I will note that the previous shape of the art building pond also did not align with reality. Still, I should have done my due diligence instead of eyeballing it and going from memory.

Also, is there any sort of limit on the number of changes you should include within one edit? I made over 100 changes within this edit, is that problematic for verification?

Thanks again for your comment.