irateh's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 116667325 | almost 4 years ago | Oh - wie wird in Japan "roeschen83" ausgesprochen ? ;-) Sag, daß es kein Zufall ist. |
| 108682352 | over 4 years ago | You deleted several ways from the map, which are still clearly visible on aerial imagery as well as in the field. They were marked as abandoned: already as they are marked as off-limits by signs on the ground. Please explain, why they should be razed from the map. |
| 108682251 | over 4 years ago | Please take a look at the discussion here:
|
| 108682251 | over 4 years ago | Hi "Ich binn es" - the common procedure for paths and ways in decay is marking them as "abandoned:highway" or "disused:highway". The deletion of ways is discouraged, as it often leads to the creation of new ways, especially if still visible on aerial images. |
| 36281576 | over 4 years ago | Hallo Geofreund - wo kommt der Name "Turm" für eine Landstrasse her? |
| 75350004 | over 5 years ago | Please consider changing visibilty or changing to abandoned:highway if you cannot locate ways. Deleting is only the scond-best option. |
| 75253565 | almost 6 years ago | Sorry, I guess you just left some traces from your welcome edit? I will clean this up for you. |
| 79300118 | almost 6 years ago | NAK! Nichts spricht gegen den Eintrag von Grenzen. Alles aber gegen das Löschen von Einträgen, nur weil deren Sinn sich gerade nicht erschließt Es gibt dafür einen Ausdruck: Vandalismus.
|
| 48915010 | over 8 years ago | the ways were previously deleted in the changesets below
|
| 47926357 | over 8 years ago | this is another undiscussed deletion of map details. the way may be dicouraged, but it is still there - please comment on this destructive interaction! |