impiaaa's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128407241 | about 3 years ago | These are clearly not cave entrances. |
| 128258082 | about 3 years ago | Please use the changeset description to say what you actually changed. See here for reference: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 128123033 | about 3 years ago | The changeset comment needs to be a description of what you changed, not your name. Read this page for some guidance: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 128043365 | about 3 years ago | Also, please use descriptive changeset comments. Here is some guidance: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 128043365 | about 3 years ago | These roads aren't part of the main road network. How can they be considered living streets? |
| 128016769 | about 3 years ago | Hello! Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving to another, to keep changeset boxes to a reasonable size. Thanks! |
| 127939383 | about 3 years ago | Please try to use a more descriptive changeset message, for example "aligned road to imagery", and try to keep changes localized to one local area. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 127899688 | about 3 years ago | Please use a changeset message to describe what you added or changed. For example, "Added camp sites". For more information, see here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 127886285 | about 3 years ago | This changeset spans half of the globe, though I can't tell what object caused it. |
| 127860543 | about 3 years ago | For a changeset with a large bounding box, it would be helpful to have a more descriptive changeset message (like, "updated opening hours"), or to split up the change into smaller areas. |
| 127820316 | about 3 years ago | Using "highway=living_street" anywhere in the US is questionable. Using it in an area completely closed off to public motor traffic is certainly wrong. highway=living_street A single building should have one way with a building=* tag along the outside. If different parts of the building are different heights, those should be tagged as building:part=*, not extra buildings themselves. building=* |
| 127744775 | about 3 years ago | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please be sure to read up on our community's best practices osm.wiki/Good_practice , or check the beginner's guide if you haven't yet osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide . In particular, you need to provide a changeset comment that describes what you changed - see here for more info osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Additionally, we appreciate it when you only make changes to one local area before saving and moving on to another. It's good to keep changesets small and self-contained, and a changeset with a large bounding box can be hard to review. If you have any questions, feel free to join any of the global or local OSM communities and ask there https://openstreetmap.community/ . Have fun mapping! |
| 127646538 | about 3 years ago | Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving on to another. |
| 127093700 | about 3 years ago | I've reverted the changes to the apartments in changeset/127113711. |
| 127093700 | about 3 years ago | Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Please save your changes in one area before moving on to another, to keep the changeset size small. Also, you've changed an apartment complex in Roseville into a Chinese restaurant. |
| 127014583 | about 3 years ago | The "error" was probably iD wanting to confirm that the restaurant was part of the Chick-fil-A brand. It should have given you two options: one to say yes, and add extra "brand" tags, and one to ignore and add a "not:brand" tag indicating that it's not the same brand. |
| 127014583 | about 3 years ago | The website seems to indicate that this location is part of the normal Chick-fil-A brand, but you've tagged it as "not:brand:wikidata=Q491516", to indicate that it is not. Which is correct? |
| 127032564 | about 3 years ago | This change has been reverted in changeset/127063935. |
| 127032564 | about 3 years ago | Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. In OSM the convention is to only map one line per road, only splitting when there's a physical separation between two sections. You can read this article on how to model intersections: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/ |
| 112699207 | about 3 years ago | I've reverted your change in changeset/127004091. Please don't blindly delete data just to fix validator issues. |