You have the wrong location. It was already mapped node/2421196465

Why is 35 The Lane an attraction?

You have added roads that no longer exist and will not exist. The Bing imagery is complete out of date for this area. This change should be reverted. I will revert it if you cannot.

Also Google maps CANNOT be used due to their licences and/or terms of use (contracts) forbid you to do so. See osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines#Ensure_that_the_data_license_is_OK.

This name you have given for way/148578805 is wrong can you stop changing names unless you have a good source for why you are using these names.

On looking at your change more It looks undid the work done in changeset/104847957.
There should be three highway ways here two tags as construction: the old carriageway and the old cycleway. And one tag as truck the new carriageway.

Please can you explain what you were trying to achieve here.

I agree that Temeside Way is part of the Southern Link Road. But I still think is name is just Temeside Way.

The street name sign for Broomhall Way just says "Broomhall Way". I assume that will be true for Temeside Way when it is finally finished.

Welcome to OSM.

I assume this change is to show that traffic is now using the new carriageway. The old carriageway is now under (re)construction ready for it to be the east bound carriageway. It should not have been deleted but marked as under construction highway=construction.

Also why have you added (Southern Link Road) to the name of the road I think it is just Temeside Way.

Comment should have been "add buddings"

You have created two items for Faun a node and a building. There should only be one.
Also the building does not follow the actual shape of the building it also includes the pavement.

This area is a 20mph Zone and is a Home Zone. The wiki says should be mapped as a living street which it was before your edit.

It should have been changed to traffic_calming=chicane see traffic_calming=*

It is difficult to delete relationship with the inbuilt editor ID. I have deleted it with JOSM.

I am confused on what you were trying to achieve by this change.
What you did do was remove part Jennet Tree Lane (way/43418095) from the relation relation/8278420#map=13/52.1514/-2.2750 .
This is not the right turn across the busy road.
I am not sure what the relation is describing. Is not a published route as far as I know. I might be somebody’s (@Jaymeee) private route. In which case maybe the relation should be deleted.

I think it should be tagged as commercial. There is some event there most weeks. It's a very commercial organisation.

This path is closed due to construction. This was discussed on talk-gb at the end of July

You have added a duplicate "Vertical Limit Climbing Gym". What were you trying to achieve?

When you added the new tenant of the shop you did not notice there was already a node there, with the shop tagged as vacant. I have mergeD the two nodes as there was address information on the original node.

By private I was talking about the cycle route not the physical roads etc.
A cycle route in OSM should be a named or numbered or otherwise signed route, see route=bicycle. It should not be a personal route.

Is this your private route? Or is it publish anywhere?

Comment should have been "updates after a walk"