I think so. There are no signs but it's clearly part of the park, not a public road. changeset/178537427
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178523002

I am learning all kinds of useful tools, such as Cadastral Parcels, from looking at your changes.

That's not intentional, and I'll fix it!

No, this is the iD issue I meant to reference... https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7199

No, this is the iD issue I meant to reference... https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7199

This changeset seems to have failed to apply after resolving conflicts, possibly iD bug https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8025

This changeset seems to have failed to apply after resolving conflicts, possibly iD bug https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8025

I think some historical changes have left it unclear. All of way/42727781 was one-way until the offices were built (around 2014?) then the central lane markings were added. As I'm not sure how to interpret the present markings, I'll revert the change.

changeset/178284497

That was quick, I noticed I'd got some left/right tags swapped and went into StreetComplete to fix them. It was confusing when they were already corrected!

What is the source for the name "Pont Twym" and not "Pond Twym"? Growing up in the area I always heard it called Pond Twym, although a google search shows references to both spellings.
Also, the correct OSM key would be not:name, not not_name

node/6510091490 doesn't seem to merit the place=neighbourhood tag. Would an area with landuse=residential + name="Knight's Bridge Apartments" + residential=apartments be more suitable? I'm new at this.