Hi, thanks for letting me know. I will delete the `area=yes` feature (way/1017984521) and restore that tag on the existing footway (way/111137081).

I had added the `access=private` tag to match the nearby gate and service roads, but see how pedestrians could access this from the north. Perhaps a `motor_vehicle=private` tag would be more appropriate in this context.

I believe you are correct, it does still remain. I have undeleted the highway segment and added `vehicle=no` and `bicycle=no` tags to match the connecting service highways. Thanks for pointing this out!

Hi Kovoschiz,

Thanks for the helpful advice. My edit was to make this highway consistent with the others in this bus station. Would you like me to replace all of the `vehicle=no` tags within this area?