OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179763561

@MappingMore May i ask what exactly (and why) you reverted? This is changeset/179763561; you wrote 179702671, but that is none of my CS??

171971502

no answers - see changeset/174738857

171971502

One more question: why did you use the cutting tag here?

171971502

@Langers1234567890
You added lanes and maxspeed information for several roads here in Kasai, DRC. What is the source for this information? I really doubt whether something like maxspeed (a maximum legal speed limit ) exists on a road like that. If there is no reliable source, this information should be deleted.

171466879

Ok, i remapped 5 elements and deleted my versions (4 landuses and a road). Mea culpa, but still no idea how that happened.

171466879

22 days ago. At that time i had started to map in that region before the first Ebola projects went online. And there are older edits of mine, back at least to 2019.
I can not explain these duplications right now, that is all a bit strange. Will have a closer look later this evening. If you find more, please send info in this discussion.
Thank you and many greetings
Henning

34366156

Hello Mateusz,
this was really a long time ago and i cannot remember any details. The history shows that i introduced these tags, but i have no idea what they mean. And for sure i have no local knowledge of this street name.
Is it possible that these tags were produced by JOSM when i split an existing way? This would be typical for mapping streets with e.g. bridges.
In that case, user "Osm153" could be the one who used these tags first, as in way/372546906 .
Henning (hebolz)

140332870

Hallo Users Angie19 und Bionaturhandel,
was auch immer Ihr hier in OSM eintragen wolltet: das place tag ist dafür sicherlich nicht angebracht. Auch gibt es an dieser Stelle keinen city_block mit dem angegebenen Namen.
Genausowenig wie es im Node daneben eine Hausnummer 1 mitten auf der Straße gibt.

Im jetzigen Zustand ist beides mit den OSM Richtlinien nicht vereinbar. Im Wiki findet Ihr bestimmt ein besser geeignetes Tag.

112200643

@_pressanykey
Hat dieses Gebäude tatsächlich den öffentlich genutzten Namen "Wohnhaus am Eberstein"? Gibt es eine nachvollziehbare Quelle dafür? Ansonsten ist es nur ein beschreibender Text, der im name-tag nicht zulässig ist. (siehe Wiki)

105150174

@HoRadelt
Bin gerade über diesen CS gestolpert. Das name-tag ist nicht dazu da, schöne Sprüche auf die Karte zu zaubern. Siehe bitte Wiki und "mappen für den Renderer".
Wesentlich kritischer ist die Quellenangebe "Komoot". Ich bezweifele daß die Komoot Lizenz eine Verwendung in OSM erlaubt. Ohne vorherige Prüfung ist das ein NoGo.

122632808

@AmanBD Thank you for this information. I mapped this as part of HOT project #12820 with the objective of closing gaps in the main road network. The final classification can only be done by people like you with local knowledge.

123020529

Hello wendy23thimble, i noticed your many contributions of buildings in DRC. Other users seem to do the same, all using the changeset comment "#missingmaps Building Mapping". Is this an official MissingMaps project? If yes, it wood be good to give more details in the CS, especially when this is an organised editing. Maybe you could give me some background information, or direct me to someone else?
Greetings
Henning (user hebolz)

123023794

Please read my messages in the tasking manager about project #12381.

>> @Ivon2018 I wrote you already about the necessity to square buildings, but it seems you do not read these messages in the Tasking Manager. Until now, i squared them myself and validated your tiles. As this is an elemental problem, i have to invalidate now.

114699339

Hello UNGSC-mpicaro, i have a question concerning way/1010199439 and the connected highways. It seems that you changed the classification of one continuous highway according to the respective landuse. in this case, you changed between track and residential. This is unusual, i have not seen this before. Is this a generally accepted concept? And where is it described?

119596864

in addition to my first message: way/1051150877 is an example of what should not happen. It is visible on Bing, but goes right through a large building , visible on newer imagery from Maxar. I will have to delete it.

119318603

@ElvaFlannery
you have mapped roads and buildings in the city of Lwambo, Kambove region, DRC, based on Bing imagery. Please be informed that the region is part of a larger project (HOT tasking manager, project #12252) which uses Maxar premium imagery only. I would suggest to map the region by TM only. It loads the correct imagery automatically and avoids conflicts by overlapping mapping.
Henning (user hebolz)

117737243

https://learnosm.org/es/beginner/
hay muchos otros tutoriales sobre OSM e iD, pregunta a google o Youtube.

Cada cuadrado rojo en iD es un edificio ya incluido en OSM. Los nuevos edificios se describen en base a la fotografía aérea.
Dibujas los edificios existentes en lugar de crear otros nuevos.
Mañana corregiré los errores.

117737243

I have no idea what you are speaking about???! Should we change language? French, German, spanish very limited?

117737243

@mirluy
You are mapping buildings on top of already mapped buildings. This results in useless double structures that have to be deleted again. Also, your changeset comments are refering to HOT project #8171 without using the tasking manager.
Please explain what and why you are doing this. Or contact me directly via OSM messaging system.
Henning (user hebolz)

116097395

@NoKnow You changed scrub to building, which makes no sense here. Please be careful when changing relations. They can be tricky and you might destroy a lot of work easyly.
I will repair the tag.