Hi skyper,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community, but want to make sure it is accepted by all the community members. In the past , few community members informed us not to add access information to driveways. Once DWG members inform us the corrective action, will inform it to all the community members and get it implemented as well. Thanks again for the suggestion.

Thanks for checking into our edits.
1.we are making the edits based on the aerial view and available OSM resources
2.apologies, i have missed to make the edits with respect to offset feature. please find the changeset/90647928, for the necessary modifications.I will make sure to check the entire vicinity for the offset before making any new changes.
3. we didn’t have any other valid source to add the access information. To avoid wrong information being added, we limited our edit to just add basic road. But given a feedback from local community members, we immediately take it up and add access information. Please do let us know if there is any other possible way to identify the access information from the available resources of OSM, happy to learn about this and implement in my editing.
4. apologies, it is a miss from my end. please find the changeset( 90647928 ) for the suggested modifications

thanks for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to implement your suggestion in the future edits. always happy to learn from the community

I have added the gate based on the blocker that is visible in the bing imagery. After toggling different imagery, it is evident that the gate is opened and closed in multiple imagery. Hence added the gate and gave access as private as per the learning's from the community. i have not added any access restrictions since the other road has no gates. please let me know in case of any modifications required. all our edits are scrutinized by our internal team. apologies, i am not aware of the german language. we deep dive each comment before providing the reply.

Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. Always happy to earn from the community.

Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935. Our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks for your time in checking our edits. Made this change as the connecting road segment is added as a track road by community member previously. Reverting the change as per the suggestion and changing the connected road classification to service as well. Please find the changesets 83452876 and 83453156 for modifications. Always happy to learn from the community

Hi ndm,

Thanks for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I understand the mistake now and will be more careful going forward. I've modified the directions as there wasn't sufficient information due to lack of street level imagery, please refer changeset ( 79595963). I would request you to please make any further changes to the edit performed by me as you have the local knowledge of the area. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.

Regards,
harinikh

Hi user_5359,

Thank you for looking into my edit. This was an honest mistake. I would be more craeful going forward and would not repeat it in future. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.

Regards
harinikh