I'm sorry to say you were too late! I was indeed enjoying the nice spring an bouldering in an around Fontainebleau, but I left for home on Sunday. I'm now mapping based on memory and Strava. I didn't pay particular attention to the forest compartment numbers while I was there, so I don't think there's much I can do to help you.

Hei,

Jeg ser at du i dette changesettet la til track_ref på sporene på Grefsen. To av sporene endte opp med ref 3. Jeg ville tenkt at det ene skulle hatt ref 4. Tar jeg feil her?

Se diskusjonen på github (https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/8507) ift. hvorfor jeg landet på en restriction i stedet for access-tagging.

Jeg valgte en no_entry-relasjon fordi det er i praksis det som impliseres av skiltet her. Det er ikke noe tilsvarende skilt i andre kjøreretning, så det er ikke noe faktisk forbud mot motorvogn på veien. Man har bare ikke lov å kjøre inn på veien fra dette krysset.

Jeg har ikke lagt til unntak for buss fordi unntaket bare gjelder buss i rute. Buss i rute er bare et lite subsett av alt som kalles buss, og rutebussjåfører er i mindre grad i målgruppen for OSM-basert navigasjon. Om du vet om tags som kan uttrykke "buss i rute", så kan vi heller legge det til.

By law, this road cannot be access=private, only motor_vehicle=private. I guess that is what was intended in this changeset.

Den er basert på NiB-prosjekt Aurland 2019: https://www.norgeibilder.no/?x=72424&y=6783726&level=17&utm=33&projects=3101&layers=&plannedOmlop=0&plannedGeovekst=0

Ganske tydelig at det i alle fall går et tråkk der. Vanskelig å si om dette er brukt av mennesker eller ei.

Hey Peter,

This note refers to an object you added in this chageset: note/4227078

Do you know if it still exists?

Jeg la inn stien igjen i vente på eventuell begrunnelse.

Se forøvrig denne teksten om hvorfor man bør være forsiktig med å slette stier som denne: osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Hei

Denne stien er synlig på flyfoto, og ser absolutt ut til å eksistere. Hvorfor slettet du den?

I think I found the source of all the confusion.

The village was referred to as Eidskrem in some maps until 1992, but the d was a typo. This typo then ended up on some signs, some of which have been replaced and some have not. See this news article explaining it all: https://www.rbnett.no/nyheter/i/m1yOOO/derfor-heter-det-eiskrem-og-ikke-eidskrem-som-det-star-pa-skiltet

I've reverted your change here. I hope it isn't too discouraging. I know you made this change with good intentions.

SSR refers to the mountain in the southeast as "Eiskremheia": https://stadnamn.kartverket.no/fakta/255890

I can find one sign that says Eidskrem: https://vegbilder.atlas.vegvesen.no?year=2023&lat=62.7592081&lng=7.00100049&view=image&imageId=Vegbilder_360_2023.2023-07-10T06.19.54_FV00662_S2D1_m04856_360_1&zoom=16

But that is a sign pointing out a camping of some sort. It's not the name of the village.

This is true on the north side as well: https://vegbilder.atlas.vegvesen.no?year=2023&lat=62.76404659&lng=6.99766116&view=image&imageId=Vegbilder_360_2023.2023-07-10T06.27.27_FV00662_S2D1_m05419_360_2&zoom=16

The village name plate to the south said Eiskrem as of last summer: https://vegbilder.atlas.vegvesen.no?year=2023&lat=62.75290937&lng=6.99470836&view=image&imageId=Vegbilder_360_2023.2023-07-10T06.19.07_FV00662_S2D1_m04061_360_1&zoom=16

Are you saying this has changed?

What is the source of this change? The central place name registry (SSR) uses the spelling "Eiskrem". Unless there are very good reasons not to go with their spelling, we probably should. And if you have very good reasons, the more robust way to do this change is to get the name changed in SSR first. I can help you with that. Otherwise your change will likely be overwritten later.

See: https://stadnamn.kartverket.no/fakta/862870

Hi archie,

I came across a note related to the lighthouse you edited in this changeset. I'd like to try to close the note, but I discovered that I'm not knowledgeable enough about swedish data sources relating to lighthouses.

Would you mind taking a look at it?

note/1564522

Hi!

Is this an actual path, or more like a route suggestion?

There's a note questioning the path's existence: note/2809740

Could you join the discussion and share your knowledge with us?

Really appreciated Peter! We're now down to only 5 open notes in the entire Trondheim area. Thanks a lot for your help in closing the ones you took on today.

Hey Peter,

There's a note concerning a vending machine you added in this changeset. Could you have a loot at it and see if you could clear up the confusion?

note/3765534

There's a note calling into question the existence of a surveillance camera you added in this changeset: note/4089637

Want to have a look at it and help us figure out how to process it?

Hei!

Ser du navngav et hus som "Tante Ruth" i dette endringssettet. Heter huset virkelig det?

Se: note/3806549