OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
91960148 over 5 years ago

thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have misinterpreted the road classification and added a service road. thanks for the heads up. please find the changeset(92028732) for the reversion. going forward, i will make sure to add the roads more cautiously in concurrence with the ground reality. once again, thanks for the valuable suggestions. always happy to learn from the community.

89564948 over 5 years ago

"hi skyper,
thanks for the detailed explanation. we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community, but want to make sure it is accepted by all the community members. In the past few community members informed us not to add access information to driveways. Once DWG members inform us the corrective action, will inform it to the all the community members and get it implemented as well. Thanks again for the suggestion"

89564948 over 5 years ago

Hi Skyper,
Thanks for looking into my edit. I have edited based on the imagery which was slightly offset. I have modified the roads as per your suggestion (change set: 90771290 ). I Genuinely apologize for the miss from my end. I have added service roads based on point data and Building looks like commercial/Industrial entity (highway=service) . Do you think it should be a driveway? I would be happy to know your view on this.

85074561 over 5 years ago

Thanks for checking into our edits. This edit is partially based on our driver feedback and available resources. As per esri world imagery dated 2018, the area is well constructed. So, I have added a service road and made necessary modifications. Please let me know in case of any further modifications required.

82572677 almost 6 years ago

Thanks for looking into our edits. Please find the changeset (82655540) for the suggested modifications. I will make sure such mistakes will not be repeated. Please let me know in case of any further modifications required. Once again, thanks for your correction.

73872882 over 6 years ago

Hi Bernard,

Thanks for looking into my edit. I have understood the mistake and will take this as a lesson for my future edits. I have reverted the mistake and the new changeset id is #73923590. I look forward to add valuable data towards OSM. Let me know in case you have further suggestion. Will be happy to learn!

Regards
Goltapan.