Thanks

The wiki page says Tertiary is for "Local roads whose importance for through traffic is quite high" and Unclassified is for "Local roads that are not significant for routing", so unclassified was acceptable here. Anyway, I think tagging this is as tertiary is absolutely fine too, but please when doing this, ensure that the Tertiary type ends at a junction with a road of equal or higher type e.g highway=secondary or another highway=tertiary.

In other words, if L7014 is to become Tertiary, then the tertiary type should apply all the way to the point where it ends at R114. The same applies to the southern end of L7014: the L7147 and follow-on roads will have to be considered for upgrade to Tertiary, to ensure that the Tertiary road type continues until a junction with a more major road type.

Hi, living street is not part of agreed tagging scheme for roads in Ireland. See highway=living_street

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I see you changed the road type for this Local road, to a value normally used for Regional roads in Ireland.
This goes against the agreed tagging scheme for roads in Ireland, see osm.wiki/Ireland/Roads.

source: Sentinel-2

Not a typo. I've no idea what's there today, but at the time of editing, the information signs in the car park had Dublin City Council logo.

Yeah, I probably missed a few, my rule was to move on if I was still unsure after a few seconds.

Thanks

Hi,

I believe that way/1458479668 is not an acceptable method of mapping the on-road cycle lane. See section "When not to use" of highway=cycleway

Furthermore, that on-road cycle lane was already mapped at way/1016434678 using the cycleway key. Same goes for the rest of Ballyogan Road.

I'll pass, but in case you aren't already aware, someone in the states did a write-up about exactly that issue: @bmaczero/diary/407962

Yes, that was my question. Based on the current imagery I also believe there is a gate.

Hi, welcome!
It looks like your change of Irish N numbered roads to highway=secondary goes against the standard way of mapping N roads in Ireland agreed by the community.
I undid your changes to N roads in this area to restore the road type to what it was before.
Please check the OSM Wiki for the agreed tagging. See " Primary Routes" and "National Secondary Routes" on this page: osm.wiki/Ireland/Roads
Hope that makes sense.

Sorry for causing this problem and thanks for fixing it. Thanks also for the detailed explanation and guide, I'll make use of that validator from now on.

Thanks for taking the initiative to update the map and also for removing the outdated business information. Just to point out, it looks like the objects containing former business details were also containing the building outline. Building outlines should be kept if the associated building still exists. In other words, it would be better to just delete the "name" / "shop" tags and keep the buidling tag and anything else that is still correct for the affected object.

No worries, I had a go at reverting it with changeset/171377872 . I made a couple of mistakes during it, so followed up with changeset/171378632 . Looks like it's sorted now!

Hey, that roundabout is in reality a traffic lights T junction now, I drove through it last week. The road alignment in OSM was correct last week. Satellite imagery is showing a previous temporary layout of the road that was in place to facilitate construction of Intel buildings.
Also, a bunch of bus route relations have been split in two by this changeset.
I think this and changeset/171318595 need to be reverted. It can be done manually, or with tools. I'm happy to help with that if needed.

PS The CyclOSM layer on OSM website or at https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=14/53.2737/-6.2206/cyclosm are a handy way to see the cycle infrastructure that has been mapped.

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Many of the cycle lanes you added were already mapped using the cycleway tag on the road.

There are two current approaches to mapping cycle paths: cycleway=* and highway=cycleway
Please read those pages to understand their intended use, and pros/cons of each approach. Obviously choose whichever approach you feel is best for the situation at hand, but understand the meaning of each, and also that applying both approaches, like has inadvertently happened here results in duplication.

Also, many of the cycle lane/track lines you've drawn (e.g. way/1372763000) aren't continuous cycle lane/tracks in reality - there is actually no cycle lane at all for part of Sandyford Road.
The cycleway tags already added to the road reflects this intermittent and varying nature of the cycle lane/track, e.g way/108345245

It's unfortunate that the iD editor doesn't give a visual indication of cycleway presence on a road with cycleway tags on it. I made the exact same mistake when I first contributed to OSM.

I hope this all makes sense!

Re. your fixme. It is effectively one-way due to how narrow it is, and due to the turn restrictions at the western junction which prevent traffic from entering it at that end.
However, there are no road markings or signs to stop someone from driving westwards on this section of road, then parking at the side of the road and later heading back eastbound.
So in theory it is a two-way street, but it's practically one-way.

This seems to have resulted in stray house tags being added to nodes, in addition to areas (e.g. at the corners of a house).

Also FYI the wiki page for mapping houses recommends "house=semi-detached" or "building=semidetached_house", but I don't see any mention of "house=semi_detached". I could be out of the loop, I'm assuming the wiki is up to date on this.
house=*