gknisely's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 143131032 | about 2 years ago | Based on the wiki, I would say private. But definitely not access=no as it shuts off all access for routing engines. |
| 143131032 | about 2 years ago | Based on this it is https://www.nyc.gov/site/hartisland/hart-island/visitation.page You have to schedule the visit, but the public can go now. |
| 110085458 | over 4 years ago | FYI. I merged the two nodes |
| 110085458 | over 4 years ago | Hi TheRoadDudeMN. It seems you added 5 nodes that have duplicate vertices and are part of the same ways. For example, node/176011489 and node/176011491 Do you happen to know where the other 3 are located? This is causing some issues with routing engines. |
| 103929959 | over 4 years ago | Ok. Thank you for the help and feedback. Apologies again. |
| 103929959 | over 4 years ago | ok should be all set |
| 103929959 | over 4 years ago | Ok. I reverted all but way/874079010. I think if this edge is set to access=private then the routing engines will not allow anyone into or out of the site. I think this is why the user could not get out. Can we wait until data is generated to see if it works? |
| 103929959 | over 4 years ago | Hello Stefan. I had no idea that this airport had closed and is now used as a vaccination site. A user reported that they could not get out of the site and it was due to way/8039688 having access=no. Also, I thought someone accidentally changed the other ways to have private access based on openstreetcam. My apologies. Should I revert the access on the other ways and leave the access=no off for 8039688? |