Dear oba510 and Adamant1, thank you for paying your attention to this issue. Please note, that I was not deleting highway=service tags, but rather service=parking_aisle. The reason for this consist in improving road connectivity with the purpose of navigation. First, some of these roads from which tag service=parking_aisle was deleted, in fact, do not qualify as such (e.g. way/482897411 - not parking aisle but a parking entry, way/484653753 - functions as transit). Second, the segments of roads from which the tag service=parking_aisle was deleted carry out several functions, namely they can act as a passage through the parking area and/or serve to connect different parts of big parking lots together. I would like to suggest that this approach to mapping of parking areas is credible since it allows to improve visual perception of a map and to navigate better through big parkings of shopping centers or malls. What concerns small parking areas (that contain only one way), then due to the hierarchical significance of the tags highway=service and service=parking_aisle it is more appropriate to use higher standing tag highway=service since the primer function of the way in such areas would be to reach POI, whereas parking is of secondary importance. In case, if you have other questions do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards.

Thank you for noticing! I appreciate your comment.

Thank you for noticing the current situation in the area. It is important to have data based on local knowledge. I want to turn your attention to the fact that I am using Mapbox Satellite imagery as it is the most up-today imagery available (updated at the end of 2017) and GPX data. I would appreciate if you could add Mapillary or OpenStreetCam sequence to reassure the correctness of data input in order for other mappers to have more precise data and not to make same mistakes. In case if you have references to other data sources relating to the area available online it would be nice to share them with the OSM community. Kind regards.