farmal's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 72538245 | over 6 years ago | Hi AkuAnakTimur, Thank you for the correct suggestion. Necessary changes have been done here. |
| 66891554 | over 6 years ago |
Hi Andrew,
Thanks,
|
| 22954983 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across ""way/288251518
classified as 'trunk_link'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' and it should not be a link as it is a split road. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 33976786 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way/370289700 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' . Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 32066048 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way/288251424 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service' . Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 55919468 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way/557212832 classified as 'service driveway'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' . Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 72498331 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Siobkhan, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the ""way/706275800
classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around it can be classified as 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 47179407 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways between way/557212832
classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 22954983 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways between "node/2918121022
classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'unclassified' in order to avoid inconsistency. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 32945178 | over 6 years ago | "Hi AkuAnakTimur, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way/245634672
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 68399602 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Deo IRM-ED, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/678570268 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'. As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise Thanks in advance." |
| 68400245 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Elisabeth IRM-ED, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way/678565606, classified as 'track', However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential' and also these
are classified as ""unclassified"", however, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise. Thanks in advance." |
| 68316579 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Silvia IRM-ED, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the ""way/676737111
classified as 'unclassified', However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise. Thanks in advance." |
| 65600152 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Yeni IRM-RV Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the ""way/654658672
classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'unclassified'. As of now correcting the data, please suggest if it is otherwise Thanks in advance." |
| 40919478 | over 6 years ago | "Hi Bayu Adi Styawan, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across these ways ""way/375778688
where in configuration also does not seem to match the ground reality and can be changed as per this screenshot :https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-pPfbgupgWcQ/XSv3cvPlu4I/AAAAAAAAAX4/USWnG4EWCd8WvOWESG17k8wSa1LvnSgdACK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-14.png Please suggest if it is otherwise. Thanks in advance." |
| 50393151 | almost 7 years ago | "Hi restudyah, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/508548893
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 53862380 | almost 7 years ago | "Hi Yunita sari, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/541228777 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |
| 63114738 | almost 7 years ago | "Hi Hanif Al Husaini, Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/629793050 classified as 'Teritiary' and way/503906904 as 'Unclasified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance." |