Hi, I was logged in on my friend's account accidentally, thus the different names. Yes I think it's good that the QA program finds these flaws. In this case, some of the building entrances are on the second floor and do not coincide with the buildings' outer perimeter. So it's not actually a mistake.

Hi, which objects do you mean, exactly? As the edit says, the information is taken from local knowledge. In particular, the housenumbers are those written on the buildings right now. No book or something was involved.

thank you. I agree, this is a good solution.

Hi pedrojuan01, I have visited the paths on this hiking route. There is really just one existing hiking path, which is east of the mountain. The path 954503532 is non-existant. It leads down a steep cliff and then right through wilderness. Path 854165070 is recognizable in the beginning, but then disappears in rather dense grassland. It is impossible to recognize and stay on the way as a normal hiker. I'm sure, these paths officially don't exist. Sure it is possible to walk there through the wilderness as an experienced hiker. But we shouldn't lead osm users to believe that these are ordinary existing paths. What do you think?