OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176105842 20 days ago

Hi there, the areas tagged to the east were labelled heath hence the changes , but have changed back to grassland now. Thanks,

175962770 25 days ago

Hi there. I wasn't aware of your page no I'm afraid. I'll take a look and bear in mind for future edits although I believe the hierarchy should still be landuse=farmland first (unless its commonland) then type (or variant)=meadow, meadow=pasture, crop=grass depending on whether its grazed pasture, hay, silage / haylage, set aside / SFI etc. Meadow has such a wide variety of interpretations, but will bear in mind for future edits. Many thanks,

150024044 27 days ago

You are both absolutely correct, can’t remember where the source was but Dunraven estate is south of near to Ogmore. I’ll delete this erroneous node. Thanks for flagging.

172015141 4 months ago

Sure, will do. Updated now.
Thanks,

146328908 almost 2 years ago

Hi there,
Thanks for the note. I will bear in mind.
Regards,

131147593 over 2 years ago

Hi there, as already mentioned, and to answer your query, if there is already a name field given then that is left as is. The PROW designation webpage you referenced makes no indication of 'correct' or 'non-correct' combination of name field with a prow_ref tag. Thanks for sending though.

131147593 over 2 years ago

Hi there, In the absence of a formal name in this field I provide a duplicate of the prow naming as it provides a locating name when viewing in rendered mapping services which is very useful when describing where you are, and identifying it as a formal right or way as opposed to an un-adopted path. By all means feel free to amend to your wishes, but just be aware of the reasons behind the duplication. Thanks,

133395450 almost 3 years ago

The relation had been removed by another user, it has now since been reinstated.

133374717 almost 3 years ago

Perfect, thanks Andy!

133374717 almost 3 years ago

Hi dudone, you appear to have deleted the relation for the Cotswold AONB boundary in this changeset (relation/166570, v832). Would you mind reinstating please? Many thanks.

97559869 over 3 years ago

Node reinstated in changeset changeset/126785119#map=15/51.1860/-0.3900 To note though the node and its info was not deleted, just upgraded to an area fill for the carpark area. It might be worth contacting wheelmap.org to see if they can't update their search to include areas, relations, ways aswell as nodes as currently there is duplication on the map for this parking instance.

114266096 over 3 years ago

Good point, I have removed / and labelled the holes as per their website.

116826222 almost 4 years ago

No worries, there’s always a list of tasks to do!

117204450 almost 4 years ago

It’s a work in progress in terms of adding to this map but the official route card on the Surrey Hills AONB site shows the full route using ‘connecting roadways’ up to Box Hill here: https://www.surreyhills.org/discover-route/leith-hill-greenway/

114622916 about 4 years ago

Hi, thanks for taking an interest in the subject matter. Personally, where the grass fields in question are unknown (without an in person survey) if they are in use as pasture/grazing, or as set-aside (out of date terminology I know), or as a rotation crop to boost nitrogen for the next crop in that field then I would say they would be best tagged with crop=grass (as that covers all bases) rather than pasture meaning grazing for cattle/sheep/horses etc. To your second point - I think the question over how the many iterations of map styles and renderers out in existence across the web using openstreetmap data interpolate this classification system is secondary to the classification system of tagged land and especially the hierarchy of that tagging. In this instance I am proposing that the landuse=farmland tag (and crop=grass where appropriate) has a higher priority of use over the more blanket / vanilla use of just the landuse=grass tag. Happy to discuss this further in / outside of specific changesets though since it's a bit of a big topic....

114622916 about 4 years ago

Firstly, my only interest is in creating a more accrate map that better reflects the actual usage of the places being mapped. I only map places that I have been to in person or know well. Farmland is both pastoral and arable and pertains to all the land operated by a farm. A meadow is a very specific type of grassland that is not regularly grazed by livestock. Since from aerial imagery you cannot tell the difference (generally) between a true meadow and grass farmland the likelihood is that it is farmland by default. 70% of the UK is farmland which is made up of both pastoral and arable. Non-grazed meadows form a very small proportion of this figure so the default position should be that they are tagged as farmland first. Please see the wiki note on farmland here landuse=farmland and the wiki note on meadows here landuse=meadow and the wikipedia description of a meadow here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow

113740595 about 4 years ago

If you are both unintelligent enough to think that grasslands are not a type (read subset) of farmland then you crack on. Count me out.

113740595 about 4 years ago

Not sure how you are reading that grass farmland is ‘better off’ tagged as meadow from that wiki page? The post you linked clearly states “ This tag is sometimes used for tagging every agricultural area (except farmyards). However we also have separate tags for: meadows and pastures landuse=meadow” there is no mention of meadow being a ‘better’ description for grass. This is a simple classification system and the hierarchy is in place to be used. The fields are farmland (parent), the crop is grass (child).

113740595 about 4 years ago

Hi,
Farmland does not necessarily mean actively ploughed. A more accurate tag for farmland that is mainly grass would be landuse=farmland,
crop=grass
These dropdown fields in the farmland category denote their preferred use over a generic 'meadow' tag that renders differently to other farmland and stands out as an error on the rendered map. If you can revert please? Thanks, etgg

99933454 almost 5 years ago

Hi, A number of the gardens you have created within this changset have duplicate fences sitting on top of each other which makes them appear much darker then they should be when they are rendered. Please take them off the garden definition and create them as seperate elements to avoid this happening. Thanks.