To elaborate, ford=yes should be treated like bridge=yes or tunnel=yes.

The entirety of a highway that features a bridge should not be tagged with bridge=yes, but rather the way should be broken into sections and only the section involving the bridge should feature bridge=yes.

Same idea for ford=yes.

I noticed that you've edited a number of trails with ford=stream. Per the [wiki](ford=*?uselang=en), the `ford` tag should only be used on ways for the sections that actually cross a water polygon. This can affect map renderers that indicate the specific sections of highway=* ways that cross sections of water.

For what you're trying to achieve, you should just mark the individual water crossing nodes with ford=yes, or in the case of a way crossing a riverbank, you can split the highway way and tag that with ford=yes. The entire highway=path should not have a ford=* tag unless it is submerged within water in its entirety.

Agreed, these should be reverted from cycleways back to sidewalks.

Ah, sorry I didn't look back far enough in the edit history. Thanks for going through and adding the bike properties.

It looks like they were added in these change sets: @Pierocket/history

I'll start a thread in the OSMUS slack next week and see how best to manage these edits.

This added a ton of trail noise in Mount Tam that makes it impossible to differentiate official trails.

Most of the trails you've created only follow faint outlines from aerial imagery and aren't indicative of official trails.

If you insist on creating these, can you please update all of the trails you've created with an informal=yes tag: informal=*

TIL! Thanks for reverting the changes.