Thanks for pointing out. I stand very corrected. Learning taken on board and will correct.

Thanks for fixing - I couldn't reverse my mistake.

Thanks for catching that - as always - an odd name for a way ;-)

Thanks for catching that Andy. I usually catch my own stupid mistakes. rectified. Thanks. Shawn

I was trying to find a compromise, as it's also a research centre and school. When I was out there on Thursday, I was trying to find a way of describing multiuse. Tx

Well spotted. I think that I may have inadvertently clicked two ways close when submitting and connected them. I had added the spur way as a couple driveways were using it and all that was previously indicated was a cycleway. Bollards are there and added and although cycleway continues and is part of relation, roadway is terminated.

Thanks. Keep in mapping yourself :-)

Sorry for that. Another user called me out on it again. Mapping my hometown but persistent changeset comment from Irish project. Best. Shawn

I did not thanks for catching it. Inadvertently clicked create relation when squaring. It should be rectified now.

Sorry to have messed that up. It should be sorted now.
Thanks,
Shawn

Thanks. Struggled with it a bit. It looks more like a coincident pathway in the chapel itself. Modded to pathways to the periphery of the chapel ruins.

It should be corrected. Thanks for catching it. I think server lag may have stymied me.

Hi SirCowMan
Apologies. I was using the airport principal ways as a source of alignment adjustment for the Bing. If you have verified using GPS around Mr Lube and Ultramar - I will adjust Bing as per those. Much appreciated for the heads up and apologies for undoing any of your good work.

Thanks Daniel. Much appreciated. Yeah my first dip in KK and I didn't compare well between the available imagery. Yes, BING was quite out of alignment to the roadways and went with those but ended up with the big offset. Tried to clean up the mess I made there with the ESRI clarity. Thanks.

Thanks for catching. Too many machines and too many open sessions. As always appreciate your attention to detail.

As you saw - they are columns under a pediment. The periment mapped as a separate building part starting above them. Was my best attempt at trying to represent the building structure. Renders appropriately in f4 - but very open to suggestions. Tx. Shawn

Thanks very much - as always - I will adjust accordingly. I wasn't aware of that first one. Am now and checked those definitions. Have to say Celbridge area is sure looking nicely mapped with all the landuses let alone detail. Thanks.

Sorry. Messed that up trying to map duration of the speed hump. Should be fixed now . Tx.

Thanks for catching that. Have no idea how the clipboard got pasted into the surface label. Apologies. Fixed.

Thanks for that. They do seem to join up on the latest imagery. Was using the new Bing. I do think yes the last portion of the way to the south should be path and separated it from track where it joins the other foot path.