dvillas's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 182982486 | Correction: Comment is "Reviewed and made minor edits to Calle 15 according to satellite imagery. #adt" |
|
| 182854374 | Comment is Updated Strada Oituz. |
|
| 182302758 | Hello rarad74, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate you for letting me know that the best source of imagery around the Bucharest area. I will keep this in mind for future edits within the area. Warm regards,
|
|
| 181417740 | Hello Eduardo17172, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. After reviewing recent satellite imagery I agree that this segment of Sierra street looks like a oneway heading northbound. I initially removed the oneway tag due to vehicles I saw parked facing both directions. Warms regards,
|
|
| 181343233 | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-02-15 |
|
| 181118433 | Hello rarad74, I agree this road shouldn’t be tagged as unclassified; however, residential seems more appropriate here than living_street. I wanted to ask how you distinguish between residential and living_street, as I’ve noticed these tags are used somewhat inconsistently throughout the town. According to the OSM Wiki, living_street typically implies specific legal conditions (e.g., pedestrian priority, low speed limits, special parking and traffic rules), which aren’t verifiable here, so I’m hesitant to apply that tag. If you could share how you determine when to use residential vs. living_street in this area, that would be helpful for keeping future edits consistent. thanks! |
|
| 179310663 | Correction: editing comment should be, "Updated Shahrah-e-Mirza Mughal via recent ground level imagery(KartaView). #adt" |
|
| 178378364 | Source used was Mapbox Satellite |
|
| 177202295 | - Source Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery |
|
| 177817680 | Correction: Source used was Mapillary. |
|
| 176963626 | Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite |