OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
162240730 11 months ago

Hi,

I considered this change a no-brainer and therefore its description is quite short. Let me explain the nature of the change in more detail. I haven't removed any nodes, only specific tags. I.e. all the public_transport=stop_position's are in their place. I removed only direction=forward and direction=backward tags. There are no relations containing the touched nodes other than public transport relations. All the stop positions updated are only stop positions, not also traffic signs or anything.

As I understand, the direction tag on a public_transport=stop_position node has any meaning only for PTv1 routes. Since all the mapped routes containing the modified stop_position's have been eventually converted to PTv2, the direction tags seem to be redundant now. They aren't officially deprecated because PTv1 isn't officially deprecated. But since PTv1 routes have gone in this Londonish area completely, why to keep the associated direction tags?

Could you, please, give more details on the mentioned non-bus routing. An example would be great. I really want to understand the issue if I haven't answered your question yet.

Thank you

41880669 11 months ago

Hello, I believe this postbox (node/348176324) is type_d not type_e. The information on the types is scarce, but this page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Isle_of_Man_Post_Office_gold_postbox_for_Peter_Kennaugh) and similar ones mention such postboxes as type_d. Please, take a look.

152917120 over 1 year ago

Thank you for your feedback. I have a few more days to get familiar with local postbox scheme. More survey data will result in more accurate tags for sure. Have a great day!

150626161 over 1 year ago

Hi,

It's right in the middle of the pavement. Here are its photos. I didn't find that long ref number though. https://postimg.cc/gallery/bjvSyK0

By the way, thank you for your activity with post boxes.

150322182 over 1 year ago

DorneyLake123, you map post boxes in very different places, what is your data source?

149811176 over 1 year ago

Thank you!

147058057 almost 2 years ago

Hi Kasper,

Thank you for a good question. Perhaps, how can we know name is in English without comparing it with name:en? I personally was surprised that name for Denmark isn't in Danish. Another reason for name:en to be here, I believe, is that there is the official name for the country in English. If something has an official name in language xx, this name is put to name:xx.

I'm not going to force the presence of name:en if you believe you have a good reason to remove it. This is just my preference to be explicit about tags.

Thank you,
Ivan

145229319 almost 2 years ago

Hi Woodpeck, thank you for reaching me! Which pub in Ukraine you mean? Maybe I'm missing something because I'm away from my laptop right now. Or maybe you commented on the wrong changeset. Please, provide a link to the specific pub in Ukraine so I could check its history. Of course, some mistakes can happen to me, I'm ready to fix or revert if it's the case.

137035944 over 2 years ago

I believe we can't treat the date of a recent edit as check_date:* tags. Yes, this logic works in many cases. That said, check_date:* is the proper approach to the issue of stale data.

I agree that check_date:* tags aren't as widespread as they deserve to be. This seems to be the reason why you have to look at the date of the latest edit.

137035944 over 2 years ago

This tag was mentioned on two wiki pages (not by me). Also, taginfo had reported 100+ cases of its usage before I committed more. In general, it looked like another effort of connecting OSM and Wikidata which is usually considered a useful thing. It wasn't me who started the effort, but my knowledge of Overpass and JOSM was enough to mostly finish it.

I agree that royal_cypher:wikidata tag is not of high importance. That said, consider it as metadata like check_date:* which helps people and tools to process and maintain OSM data.

125688103 about 3 years ago

{{vote|yes}} Нарэшце (dunkaist) -- [[User:Dunkaist|Dunkaist]] ([[User talk:Dunkaist|talk]]) 14:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

105364193 over 3 years ago

Это как минимум loc_name, потому что "дикая яблоня" там означает конкретное дерево, а не любую дикую. Как выбирать между name и loc_name, мне не всегда ясно

100203185 over 3 years ago

Этот дом так называют местные, как и остальные объекты. Возможно, имеет смысл перенести в loc_name

123689564 over 3 years ago

А там какие-то из соседних улиц с тем же корнем уже имели в name:be что-то с корнем раднік. Решил не выпендриваться и делать единообразно

123689564 over 3 years ago

Вечер добрый. Буйко имеется в виду, очевидно, вот этот: https://be.wikipedia.org/wiki/Аляксандр_Міхайлавіч_Буйко
Т.к. ударение на последний слог, то мне не очевидно, как это будет склоняться. Не стесняйся исправлять меня, если уверен. Видимо, годы в Москве не прошли бесследно :'-(

117028192 almost 4 years ago

Я не против, исправляй.

На самом заведении написано ПЕКАРНЯ с логотипами по сторонам. Смотрится нелепо, но как есть. Это примерно как если бы на пятёрочке было "5 СУПЕРМАРКЕТ 5".

Mapillary здесь: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.796190555187&lng=37.719239411107&z=17&pKey=2725395934424182&focus=photo