Parece a mi que Node ID 3802768494 (teleseconderia Heroico Batallon de San Blas) es mal ubicado. Se lo encuentra encima de una casa particular. ¿Se pueda revisarlo?

Mirig, my policy is to NEVER delete other people's work. If I see something I regard as questionable I engage in a discussion. I have had too much of my work deleted to not understand the ill feelings that causes. Also, since I really don't understand your purpose with this polygon, I have no thoughts on how it might be modified. Landuse in San Blas is very mixed. As far as I am aware there are no zoning regulations, and, somewhat unfortunately, any landuse can be found next to any other. I found this out when my neighbor established a fiber glass factory and I was forced to move because of the noise, fumes and dust.

Anyway, if you believe this polygon serves some purpose you have in mind, I will not question it further.

I am curious about the purpose of the polygon 60220954 in this changeset tagged landuse=residential. It is a very coarsely drawn area that includes many non residential land uses, such as businesses, manufacturing, education, sports, and government; in short all urban functions. If no justification can be made for its existence I would propose its elimination.

Perhaps you could expand on the concept of ¨appropriate for rough natural features like natural waterways and coastlines¨. I selected a segment length of approximately 5 meters because in the extremely complex mangrove forest ecosystem many features would be missed (small islands or inlets) or misrepresented (venas important to navigation) by a longer segment length. It is not clear to me what problem arises from the higher resolution.

I have now restored all 6 of the deleted relations using the procedure outlined above. I am open to any other suggestions for repairing the damage I have caused. I can think of nothing else to do, so I will return to my mangrove mapping.

I tried the JOSM reverter plugin but it just produced a string of nodes along the coastline. It did nothing to restore the relations.

Freyfogle-I´m afraid that I don know how to reverse a changeset. The procedure that I used was the best I could devise. Perhaps you could direct me to some reference material on how to reverse a changeset. Otherwise, I was planning on working on rolling back the changes to the municipalities right now, using the procedure I used with the Nayarit state relationships.

Also, I tried to contact you directly by replying to the email you sent. That was returned as undeliverable. When I tried to message you through your user page I got a server error 500 message. Maybe we can set up a more direct link if you email me using my OSM user name at hotmail.com. Meanwhile, I will be researching other means of rolling back changesets.

I believe that I have repaired the problem for Nayarit State using the procedure I described above. Please let me know if I was successful or if there are still issues. If this procedure worked as I expect, I will proceed to rectify the other relations ASAP. I apologize to all I have inconvenienced with my blunder and I promise to learn more about relations before I screww around with them again.

Mea culpa. I think I understand my error, and have spent a couple of hours studying how to rectify it. My plan is to load all of the ways and nodes listed in the relationship history into JOSM, select them all, then using the relationship editor, re-apply all of the relationship tags listed in the history. Given my obviously limited understanding of relationships, I think this should correct my mistake. It might take me a couple of days to find the time to get this done but I will work on it as fast as possible. Any comments?

Thanks for the comment. I will look at the issue when I get time--hopefully later today. My procedure in the areas where the coastline co-locates with and thena political boundary is to duplicate the political boundary and use the duplicate as the coastline. In this process, I remove the relationships from the duplicate. It is not unlikely that I screwed up and removed the relationships from the original, not the duplicate. I will look into this ASAP.