Thank you for spotting that tag! I've already removed it, as it was never intended to be uploaded.

Salut 👋
Wann ech gelift keng Testdaten am OSM androen (an wann, dann erëm läschen😉)

Léif Gréiss,
David

Moien Misch123 👋

I noticed that you changed the tagging of the street to “unclassified”. In Luxembourg, we don´t use that tag, as it is very imprecise (and it doesn´t make any claims anything access restrictions). I reverted the changes related to the street, as we keep a consistent tagging scheme. If you want to add access restrictions to streets, I recommend you look into the “access” tag: access=*. Setting this tag will discourage routing algorithms from using these streets when calculating routes. In your changeset comment, you claim that it is a private street, are there street signs indicating this? It’s been a while since I’ve last been in Junglinster 😊
I was also wondering whether the segment of the street which connects to “Route de Luxembourg” is called that as well. The Geoportail states that that segment is already “Rue Rhamm”.
Welcome to OSM, feel free to reply to this message if you have any questions!

David

Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM in Luxembourg 😊
Unfortunately, the changeset/111050946 with the description “Bambësch” broke the multipolygon. I reverted it, as I could not figure out what the improvements were by looking at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111050946. Perhaps you could provide some additional information?

Happy mapping,
David

Hallo,
ich wollte nachfragen, ob die Chargy Ladestation [1] sich tatsächlich im Gebäude befindet, oder ob sie sich gegenüber auf dem Parkplatz befindet.

David

[1] node/5481379271

Hola, estas ediciones se registran en el ticket #2021070310000111. Jtorresriv proporcionó la exención necesaria, pero no creo que se haya subido a la wiki pública de OSM :)

(Tenga en cuenta que este texto se ha traducido automáticamente)

David Morais Ferreira (With my DWG hat on)

Vielen Dank für die Infos! :) Auf den Luftbildern ist das Eisengitter noch nicht sichtbar, deshalb war ich mir nicht sicher, ob man nicht doch irgendwie noch durchkommt.

Hallo,
Ist es für Fußgänger/Radfahrer verboten, die Gleise an dieser Stelle zu überqueren?
Danke,
David

Update: I asked @NunoCaldeira on Telegram, this segment is open again.

Hi, is this segment completely closed to traffic?

Hi, wissen sie zufällig, op way/25627857 noch besteht?

Hi, Danke für die Änderung :)

Ich hätte die Stromleitungen fast wieder hinzugefügt, da ich diesen Changeset nicht davor gesehen habe. Am besten wäre es, wenn man dafür Lebenszyklus-Namen verwendet [1], also power=line auf razed:power=line ändern, anstelle sie komplett zu löschen. Dann kommt es nicht vor, dass andere Mapper die Strommasten/-Leitungen sehen und die Leitung wieder hinzufügen. Die Orthobilder werden ja jährlich im Sommer aufgenommen.

Happy Mapping!
dmlu

[1] osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Hi, was there a reason why you deleted the service roads inside the Heisdorf power plant? They were properly tagged with access=private.

+Memorial inscription in Differdange

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap 🎉🎉😊

Thank you for your first contribution!

If the garden has completely moved to the new location, you should remove the name "Old Gaart Belval location" from the old garden. That way there won't be any ambiguities.

Perhaps you want to add website=* to your new location?

Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions!

Kind regards,
David / dmlu

Hi, the speed cameras are tagged via a relation (for example [1]). Therefore, the position of the node representing the radar can be placed on the exact location :)

The wiki entry states the following: "Placed where the enforcement device is located" [2].

[1] relation/9916705
[2] osm.wiki/Relation:enforcement#Members

Merci! :)

Félicitations!🎉🎉🎉

Hi, I think something may have gone wrong with way/907068268, way/907068267, way/907068269 and way/907068270 :)

Happy mapping,
David

👏👏👏