dmlu's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
116033583 | over 3 years ago | Thank you for spotting that tag! I've already removed it, as it was never intended to be uploaded. |
116071412 | over 3 years ago | Salut đ
Léif Gréiss,
|
112681366 | over 3 years ago | Moien Misch123 đ I noticed that you changed the tagging of the street to âunclassifiedâ. In Luxembourg, we donÂŽt use that tag, as it is very imprecise (and it doesnÂŽt make any claims anything access restrictions). I reverted the changes related to the street, as we keep a consistent tagging scheme. If you want to add access restrictions to streets, I recommend you look into the âaccessâ tag: osm.wiki/Key:access. Setting this tag will discourage routing algorithms from using these streets when calculating routes. In your changeset comment, you claim that it is a private street, are there street signs indicating this? Itâs been a while since Iâve last been in Junglinster đ
David |
111050946 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
Happy mapping,
|
108610719 | over 3 years ago | Hallo,
David |
108799441 | over 3 years ago | Hola, estas ediciones se registran en el ticket #2021070310000111. Jtorresriv proporcionĂł la exenciĂłn necesaria, pero no creo que se haya subido a la wiki pĂșblica de OSM :) (Tenga en cuenta que este texto se ha traducido automĂĄticamente) David Morais Ferreira (With my DWG hat on) |
107106990 | almost 4 years ago | Vielen Dank fĂŒr die Infos! :) Auf den Luftbildern ist das Eisengitter noch nicht sichtbar, deshalb war ich mir nicht sicher, ob man nicht doch irgendwie noch durchkommt. |
107106990 | almost 4 years ago | Hallo,
|
104525720 | almost 4 years ago | Update: I asked osm.org/user/NunoCaldeira on Telegram, this segment is open again. |
104525720 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, is this segment completely closed to traffic? |
102946213 | about 4 years ago | Hi, wissen sie zufÀllig, op osm.org/way/25627857 noch besteht? |
102258494 | about 4 years ago | Hi, Danke fĂŒr die Ănderung :) Ich hĂ€tte die Stromleitungen fast wieder hinzugefĂŒgt, da ich diesen Changeset nicht davor gesehen habe. Am besten wĂ€re es, wenn man dafĂŒr Lebenszyklus-Namen verwendet [1], also power=line auf razed:power=line Ă€ndern, anstelle sie komplett zu löschen. Dann kommt es nicht vor, dass andere Mapper die Strommasten/-Leitungen sehen und die Leitung wieder hinzufĂŒgen. Die Orthobilder werden ja jĂ€hrlich im Sommer aufgenommen. Happy Mapping!
|
98414459 | about 4 years ago | Hi, was there a reason why you deleted the service roads inside the Heisdorf power plant? They were properly tagged with access=private. |
102177624 | about 4 years ago | +Memorial inscription in Differdange |
101567491 | about 4 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap đđđ Thank you for your first contribution! If the garden has completely moved to the new location, you should remove the name "Old Gaart Belval location" from the old garden. That way there won't be any ambiguities. Perhaps you want to add website=* to your new location? Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions! Kind regards,
|
90955239 | about 4 years ago | Hi, the speed cameras are tagged via a relation (for example [1]). Therefore, the position of the node representing the radar can be placed on the exact location :) The wiki entry states the following: "Placed where the enforcement device is located" [2]. [1] osm.org/relation/9916705
|
100002033 | about 4 years ago | Merci! :) |
100000000 | about 4 years ago | FĂ©licitations!đđđ |
99255898 | about 4 years ago | Hi, I think something may have gone wrong with osm.org/way/907068268, osm.org/way/907068267, osm.org/way/907068269 and osm.org/way/907068270 :) Happy mapping,
|
99755285 | about 4 years ago | đđđ |