OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
79799672 almost 6 years ago

Also I just found this: https://web.archive.org/web/20150610211234/http://roteiro.apau.org/zp_praiaverde.html which I got from the wikipedia article. Seems like this airstrip is (or was?) privately owned and not available to the public.

79799672 almost 6 years ago

Hi, according to this recent note (note/2053045) and the closed=yes on node/1042047355/history I assumed that it is indeed not operational. Since closed=yes isn't used widely (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/closed) I replaced it with the more popular (and actually documented) disused=yes.

However, if you have more knowledge (local or not), feel free to retag it :)

Greetings,
David

76766549 about 6 years ago

Awesome :) Thanks for the contribution!

76766549 about 6 years ago

Hi, did you check the latest geoportail.lu imagery?

76529972 about 6 years ago

Hi,

Boris: Doesn't the AS Watson stores "backend" include/process inherited addresses from the surrounding building outline?

Duplicating address information increases the maintenance costs / effort required to import all the addresses from open data and keep the addresses in OSM up-to-date with the OD data set.

Regards
David

76246118 about 6 years ago

changeset/76246240
changeset/76246163

75766073 about 6 years ago

Hi,
I removed this fuel station, as it doesn't exist.

75772118 about 6 years ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I noticed that you added a "dutch" name for this fuel station. Unfortunately it doesn't make any sense, as you only seem to have added more details about Luxembourg.

Therefore, I reverted this changeset.

75215063 about 6 years ago

Thank you for the information! :)

75215063 about 6 years ago

Hi,

Are you sure this road is "Rue Joseph Lentz"? I can see the street sign on the "Route de Luxembourg" that says "rue de la chapelle". CACLR (official dataset) also says the buildings belong to "rue de la chapelle".

75180246 about 6 years ago

Hi, could you explain what you meant to add at this location? The tags you used represent a highway rest area. Did you mean to add a bench?

Welcome to OSM :)

74983237 about 6 years ago

Hi, this shop really exists and is really called "Casa". https://fr.casashops.com/fr/magasins/strassen/705/. Therefore I reverted your changeset.

Thanks for participating in OSM :)

74752030 about 6 years ago

Hi, alles gut! :)
Vielen Dank für die Teilnahme an OpenStreetMap!

74752030 about 6 years ago

Hi, mir ist gerade aufgefallen, das mit amenity=bank nicht eine Bank (€€), sondern eine Sitzbank [1] (amenity=bench) gemeint war :)

[1] osm.wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbench

74752030 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Unfortunately it looks like your first contribution to the map went a bit sideways, as you added a bank called "Forest" in the middle of an actual forest.. I assume that the location got misplaced. If you need any help, feel free to reply to this changeset :)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

74536895 over 6 years ago

Bonjour,

Pour le champs "addr:housenumber", le format au Luxembourg consiste de chiffres suivis de lettres, sans espace: "59 A" devrait être "59A".

Merci pour votre participation à OSM! 😊

74504882 over 6 years ago

Hallo, mir ist aufgefallen, dass beim Umtaggen der Namen teilweise unübliche Tags ausgewählt wurden (z.B. Name_1).

Laut osm.wiki/DE:Key:name gibt es mehrere Möglichkeiten, um Abkürzungen, Übliche Namen sowie „offizielle“ Namen zu kennzeichnen.

Am Beispiel vom SRE / SREL, hier mein Vorschlag:
„short_name“=SRE
„old_name“=SREL
„name“=Service de Renseignement de l'État
„official_name“=Service de Renseignement de l'État Luxembourgeois

Vielen Dank für die Teilnahme an OSM 😊
David

72751640 over 6 years ago

Hi, kennst du dich eventuell mit den Zugverbinden aus, die über diesen Switch fahren? Laut note/1921890 sind Relations kaputt. Danke :)

74344668 over 6 years ago

(and prior changesets)

74221076 over 6 years ago

Hallo,
Beim Löschen der alten Straße sind mehrere Beziehungen (Relations) gebrochen. Das Löschen von Straßensegmenten ist immer problematisch, und dabei sollte man darauf achten, dass die neuen Segmente auch in die Relations hinzugefügt werden. (Ich habe sie in einem neuen Changeset wiederhergestellt.)

Vielen Dank für die Teilnahme an OSM 😊