OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
116033583 almost 4 years ago

Thank you for spotting that tag! I've already removed it, as it was never intended to be uploaded.

116071412 almost 4 years ago

Salut 👋
Wann ech gelift keng Testdaten am OSM androen (an wann, dann erĂ«m lĂ€schen😉)

Léif Gréiss,
David

112681366 about 4 years ago

Moien Misch123 👋

I noticed that you changed the tagging of the street to “unclassified”. In Luxembourg, we don®t use that tag, as it is very imprecise (and it doesn®t make any claims anything access restrictions). I reverted the changes related to the street, as we keep a consistent tagging scheme. If you want to add access restrictions to streets, I recommend you look into the “access” tag: access=*. Setting this tag will discourage routing algorithms from using these streets when calculating routes. In your changeset comment, you claim that it is a private street, are there street signs indicating this? It’s been a while since I’ve last been in Junglinster 😊
I was also wondering whether the segment of the street which connects to “Route de Luxembourg” is called that as well. The Geoportail states that that segment is already “Rue Rhamm”.
Welcome to OSM, feel free to reply to this message if you have any questions!

David

111050946 over 4 years ago

Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM in Luxembourg 😊
Unfortunately, the changeset/111050946 with the description “BambĂ«sch” broke the multipolygon. I reverted it, as I could not figure out what the improvements were by looking at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111050946. Perhaps you could provide some additional information?

Happy mapping,
David

108610719 over 4 years ago

Hallo,
ich wollte nachfragen, ob die Chargy Ladestation [1] sich tatsĂ€chlich im GebĂ€ude befindet, oder ob sie sich gegenĂŒber auf dem Parkplatz befindet.

David

[1] node/5481379271

108799441 over 4 years ago

Hola, estas ediciones se registran en el ticket #2021070310000111. Jtorresriv proporcionĂł la exenciĂłn necesaria, pero no creo que se haya subido a la wiki pĂșblica de OSM :)

(Tenga en cuenta que este texto se ha traducido automĂĄticamente)

David Morais Ferreira (With my DWG hat on)

107106990 over 4 years ago

Vielen Dank fĂŒr die Infos! :) Auf den Luftbildern ist das Eisengitter noch nicht sichtbar, deshalb war ich mir nicht sicher, ob man nicht doch irgendwie noch durchkommt.

107106990 over 4 years ago

Hallo,
Ist es fĂŒr FußgĂ€nger/Radfahrer verboten, die Gleise an dieser Stelle zu ĂŒberqueren?
Danke,
David

104525720 over 4 years ago

Update: I asked @NunoCaldeira on Telegram, this segment is open again.

104525720 over 4 years ago

Hi, is this segment completely closed to traffic?

102946213 over 4 years ago

Hi, wissen sie zufÀllig, op way/25627857 noch besteht?

102258494 over 4 years ago

Hi, Danke fĂŒr die Änderung :)

Ich hĂ€tte die Stromleitungen fast wieder hinzugefĂŒgt, da ich diesen Changeset nicht davor gesehen habe. Am besten wĂ€re es, wenn man dafĂŒr Lebenszyklus-Namen verwendet [1], also power=line auf razed:power=line Ă€ndern, anstelle sie komplett zu löschen. Dann kommt es nicht vor, dass andere Mapper die Strommasten/-Leitungen sehen und die Leitung wieder hinzufĂŒgen. Die Orthobilder werden ja jĂ€hrlich im Sommer aufgenommen.

Happy Mapping!
dmlu

[1] osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

98414459 over 4 years ago

Hi, was there a reason why you deleted the service roads inside the Heisdorf power plant? They were properly tagged with access=private.