OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
173478797

Strava uses a Mapbox map based on OSM data, so many areas are not updated quickly and depend on volunteer contributions.
On Strava, the highest-quality data mainly comes from the heatmap. The heatmap shows where people actually moved over the past year — the darker the line, the more popular the route.

173478797

我发现你是中国人 我就用中文与你交流 路线ID因为我做了切割并且直接修改 实际之前出问题的ID目前变成了way/626071871/history/3 另外所有在山上的徒步路线 因为很多路线植被茂密GPS有时会偏离 同时没法从卫星图获取道路信息 所以最好的办法还是参考strava上的热力图 看看大家的轨迹是怎么样的 同时在OSM绘制的时候可以打开背景设定的OpenStreetMap GPS轨迹选项 就可以看到很多社区分享的轨迹信息
最后还是要说 没有十足的把握 请不要轻易修改路线 也祝你享受其中的乐趣 生活愉快

173478797

Next time you go hiking, you can refer to the Strava Heatmap. The more intense (deeper) the color on the heatmap, the more frequently that path has been traveled by others.

173478797

Additionally, I noticed quite a few track editing errors in this changeset (changeset/176000274#map=14/30.17459/120.01139). These are mainly on the path heading west uphill from Longwu Tea Garden, where the tracks deviate significantly from the actual route.

173478797

Thanks for the details. In mountain areas where satellite coverage is poor, I suggest cross-referencing with the Strava Heatmap. This makes it easier to spot potential GPS offsets where a single track deviates from the collective route.

I've already fixed these two sections:

way/626071871

way/589666741

However, I found that this edit [way/544073034] shifted an originally accurate path to the wrong position. It would be great if you could double-check that section. Cheers!

173478797

It looks like a few trails were changed by mistake. If you're updating these, using high-quality GPS tracks or Strava heatmaps is really helpful for accuracy. Let’s try to keep the data as precise as possible! :)

170792869

贵人阁周边道路类型错误 已经一条通往虎跑景区的道路轨迹有误