So you are aware, the standard is to not abbreviate Edmonton Transit Service to "ETS." User Claudius Henrichs has reverted your change in changeset/186866301.

Take a look if you have not already at this user's other changesets; none of them have good comments and all are spread in random places around the world.

Acccount, if you are reading this, please check out these wiki pages:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
osm.wiki/Good_practice

Hello ShelbyGT500,

Thank you for your edits to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, you made a few edits in Wales, before jumping halfway across the world to do a few more in Alaska. This is undesirable because now everyone monitoring new changesets anywhere in the entire box has had this one show up in their list. Here is the wiki link for more info: osm.wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets

In the future, please split up your changes into separate changesets before going across the world.

Thanks for your cooperation,
deneben

Hello ID9!
I want to make sure that you entered in the correct surface for way/1529522730. You tagged it as asphalt, though on the latest Bing imagery it looks to be made of concrete. Just verifying that it is indeed asphalt; thanks :)

Hello! I am a mapper who lives in this neighbourhood and I have been sporadically mapping select areas of it in a very detailed manner for about a year now.
This service road I presume was detected by an algorithm and quality-checked by you before being added, isn't really a "road." This parking lot is more of an asphalt square with only one designated accessible spot and no other painted ones. This service road you have added wouldn't really qualify as parking aisle, is what I'm getting at.
Thanks in advance for replying to this comment and/or reverting the changeset.