No worries, I was just very confused!
Changeset boxes like this usually are from inexperienced mappers going around to random parts of the globe and changing stuff they shouldn't, so that's why I found this so fast and commented.
Thanks

What in the world? Why are the changes in Canada and Germany? How does StreetComplete even let you do that?

Erroneous and fantasy features from this changeset have been reverted in changeset/188261624.

@Acccount

Thanks for replying and admitting your mistakes! To learn the rules and standards of editing, a good place to start are the wiki pages that I commented earlier:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
osm.wiki/Good_practice

I'll list some of the most important rules here too:
1. Changeset comments:
Instead of "all i can say is i hope the satellite imagery here is up-to-date enough," changeset comments are supposed to help other mappers by describing what you changed, e.g. "Added new paths based on satellite imagery." You've been getting better with recent edits.
2. Non-copyrighted sources:
Google maps and most things like it are copyrighted, so it cannot be a source. If you wouldn't know a feature existed/had a certain tag without Google maps, then don't add it until you've actually gone out and surveyed it.
3. Local edits:
Please try to stick to areas you know well and can survey. If you want to map unmapped places to benefit the people there, try using HOT.

Thanks :)

Wow, I can't believe we're still cleaning up all the vandalism of Evpac/GregHeffley275/Wimpy_Kid/etc.

Thanks for requesting a review; there was an issue with crossing ways in this changeset. Fixed in changeset/187203680.

So you are aware, the standard is to not abbreviate Edmonton Transit Service to "ETS." User Claudius Henrichs has reverted your change in changeset/186866301.

Take a look if you have not already at this user's other changesets; none of them have good comments and all are spread in random places around the world.

Acccount, if you are reading this, please check out these wiki pages:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
osm.wiki/Good_practice

Hello ShelbyGT500,

Thank you for your edits to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, you made a few edits in Wales, before jumping halfway across the world to do a few more in Alaska. This is undesirable because now everyone monitoring new changesets anywhere in the entire box has had this one show up in their list. Here is the wiki link for more info: osm.wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets

In the future, please split up your changes into separate changesets before going across the world.

Thanks for your cooperation,
deneben

Hello ID9!
I want to make sure that you entered in the correct surface for way/1529522730. You tagged it as asphalt, though on the latest Bing imagery it looks to be made of concrete. Just verifying that it is indeed asphalt; thanks :)

Hello! I am a mapper who lives in this neighbourhood and I have been sporadically mapping select areas of it in a very detailed manner for about a year now.
This service road I presume was detected by an algorithm and quality-checked by you before being added, isn't really a "road." This parking lot is more of an asphalt square with only one designated accessible spot and no other painted ones. This service road you have added wouldn't really qualify as parking aisle, is what I'm getting at.
Thanks in advance for replying to this comment and/or reverting the changeset.