Hey there, thanks for your contribution! For the future, do you think you could not connect the landuses directly to highways (including sidewalks)? It makes it hard to update the geometry of the landuse and the adjacent highway later.

Hey there, I'm curious as to why you decided to upgrade this road to secondary. All it seems to do is connect these neighboring residential areas to the larger roads north and south of it, and it isn't really acting as a connector for through traffic yet.

I've never seen a utility box with an address, woah. Can you also add some tags to indicate it's a utility box? Maybe `man_made=street_cabinet`, along with `utility`=* and `ref`=* keys.

Hello again! What's the source on Trinity Falls Pkwy in McKinney being median-separated south of Crescent? Esri and the newest imagery I can find still suggest that road is only on the east side.

This address is in the middle of an intersection. Did you mean to add it elsewhere?

Hey there, thanks for your contribution! Can you add the name of the apartment complex to a new area for the apartment complex itself, and then add the building number to the "ref=" key? The complex name should not be in the building name.

Hey there, thanks for your contribution! I'm surprised there were this many traffic lights missing, tbh. Can I ask why you removed the `highway=crossing` tags where sidewalks intersected driveways?

Hi there, can you please make your changeset comments more descriptive? 99% of your changeset comments are just "accuracy updates" which tells us nothing about what you've actually done.

What's the source on the residential roads opening up near Everwell Lane? Esri has them as still under construction

Using B-Roll provided by DFWIA: https://dfw.intelligencebank.com/customshare/index/KDj0d

Hey there! Why did you remove the tags on the stopping positions for
TM at the DFW Airport Terminal B station? Seems like the Silver
Line should get added to the rail on the right instead.

Why does this line have no other tags besides name? Also, the only source I can find for this is https://www.elections.ca/map_02.aspx?lang=e&p=06_ON&t=/1Dis/35010&d=35010, of which the existing boundary seems to already use: relation/18576232

As far as I'm aware, it is actually called Park Road 20 in Grayson County's GIS maps. Plus, the name was Park Road 20 prior

btw, tactile_paving=yes should only be added to crossings if they have tactile paving along the entire length of the crossing - if tactile paving is only present on the ends of the crossing, place a lowered/flush/raised curb at that point and put tactile_paving=yes on those points.