boundary=census must be closed, why is this tag only applied to this part of the full Tucson boundary?

Hello, I believe CROF in the building name needs to be expanded to its full title, as abbreviations are usually not allowed in names. DART is fine as that is one of its official names

Hi there, and thanks for your change! The operator tag additions are nice, but I don’t think the name of a track should be named after the service that runs on it - that’s what the route relations are for. The tracks are physically for light rail vehicles, and technically any DART LRV can traverse the tracks without being on the red/blue line, so the name field should be reverted to DART Light Rail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177100622

Looks good to me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176924629

at least in Sachse it is

Isn't SH 78 signed on the ground as the street name though?

Hey there, and thanks for your contribution! This edit looks OK! If you're adding a business, be sure to add a new point with specific tags.

Hey again, thanks for the edits! The comment for the other edit stands: school tags are better on School Grounds areas rather than individual points, unless the school is only one part of an existing building. For Jones MS, the point looks a little misplaced - and that too, would be better as a School Grounds area if possible.

Hey there, welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! Regarding the review requested: since there is an existing School Grounds area enclosing the school, you should edit/add the tags on that instead of placing a new node.

Hey there, thanks for your contribution! For the future, do you think you could not connect the landuses directly to highways (including sidewalks)? It makes it hard to update the geometry of the landuse and the adjacent highway later.

Hey there, I'm curious as to why you decided to upgrade this road to secondary. All it seems to do is connect these neighboring residential areas to the larger roads north and south of it, and it isn't really acting as a connector for through traffic yet.

I've never seen a utility box with an address, woah. Can you also add some tags to indicate it's a utility box? Maybe `man_made=street_cabinet`, along with `utility`=* and `ref`=* keys.

Hello again! What's the source on Trinity Falls Pkwy in McKinney being median-separated south of Crescent? Esri and the newest imagery I can find still suggest that road is only on the east side.

This address is in the middle of an intersection. Did you mean to add it elsewhere?

Hey there, thanks for your contribution! Can you add the name of the apartment complex to a new area for the apartment complex itself, and then add the building number to the "ref=" key? The complex name should not be in the building name.

Hey there, thanks for your contribution! I'm surprised there were this many traffic lights missing, tbh. Can I ask why you removed the `highway=crossing` tags where sidewalks intersected driveways?

Hi there, can you please make your changeset comments more descriptive? 99% of your changeset comments are just "accuracy updates" which tells us nothing about what you've actually done.

What's the source on the residential roads opening up near Everwell Lane? Esri has them as still under construction

Using B-Roll provided by DFWIA: https://dfw.intelligencebank.com/customshare/index/KDj0d

Hey there! Why did you remove the tags on the stopping positions for
TM at the DFW Airport Terminal B station? Seems like the Silver
Line should get added to the rail on the right instead.