davidmguest's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 135586982 | I changed it to use the same transliteration as for the the nearby village. way/705445681 |
|
| 134554058 | I've applied the first chunk of reverts.
|
|
| 134554058 | Should I continue checking or do you wish to apply Daniel's revert? |
|
| 134554058 | I did not change any highway tags.
|
|
| 134554058 | 252724820 has been reverted.
|
|
| 134554058 | The use of name tags for numeric names in that are was based on the pre-existing tags for other such roads in the area eg way/122109629 tagged by @eric22. way/252724820 appears in Bing imagery to be a continuation of way/346053155 with no junctions or exits, and with the same grade of highway. I suspect that the highway=tertiary is probably incorrect in this case. |
|
| 134554058 | I have reverted the ref tags, and set the numeric road names as name tags |
|
| 135504245 | amended to use alt_name, alt_name:en etc |
|
| 135465510 | Thanks for spotting my typo. I've now corrected it to name:en1 |
|
| 133955228 | Zeev,
|
|
| 134628479 | Yes, thanks.
|
|
| 134148302 | For trees, the name tag should only be used where that particular tree has distinct and significant name. Details of the type of tree should not normally be recorded in the name tag |
|
| 134125367 | As Hebrew words do not correspond exactly to English words, there can not be just one "correct" translation. This is especially true with proper names.
|
|
| 134428079 | Thank you, yes.
|
|
| 52337701 | yes - typo now corrected - thanks |
|
| 52278212 | typo - now corrected - thanks |