OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
185066307

Also, as seen in your bio, you guys are not even from an area close to here, and have never driven on these roads.

185066307

Sorry, but this is all wrong. First of all, there is no parking aisle, I don’t even know what you are talking about. Second, the logic that people would get on the motorway and come off is true, as to continue on RI 114 you have to take what is signed as a 1 lane exit off of the mainline. Third, this situation with the “parking aisle” you are seeing is not a parking aisle, it’s the start of the shoulder for RI 24.

185073913

Standard practice is to map the street between the curbs, not the center line.

184791321

Sorry, but this is incorrect

184762417

It is per the classification guidelines. I’ve noticed you are changing a lot of road classifications lately. I suggest you read over the MA classification guidelines. Most roads are already tagged correctly.

181909201

Street signs mention Blackfan Street.

181909201

Hello,
Street signs are present on Blackfan Street. It is not signed as Blackfan Circle.

183720158

Street sign says private street.

183696724

See access=*

highway=busway

changeset/183697009

183666040

access=bus is not a valid tag

182486313

This is not a motorway.

changeset/183475036

183330900

I’ll add the curbs back, but Mapbox satellite aligns better with GPS trace here.

182527044

It’s all done now, been fixed

183263752

Hello, in this changeset you have created overlapping ways that cause routing issues.

changeset/183279436

183273936

Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. As seen on OSM wiki, roads that lead to a bus depot should be tagged highway=service + access=no + bus=yes

changeset/183279361

183273492

Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines.

changeset/183279202

182940136

Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines.

changeset/183279202

183232290

https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?location=42.376171%2C-71.029431%2C17

183232290

Yes it does

183210069

This is not a secondary road per https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?filters=eyJDTEFTUyI6WzEsNl0sIkZfQ0xBU1MiOlszLDNdfQ%3D%3D&location=42.377309%2C-71.028930%2C17

changeset/183232233