cubbe8's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 185066307 | Also, as seen in your bio, you guys are not even from an area close to here, and have never driven on these roads. |
|
| 185066307 | Sorry, but this is all wrong. First of all, there is no parking aisle, I don’t even know what you are talking about. Second, the logic that people would get on the motorway and come off is true, as to continue on RI 114 you have to take what is signed as a 1 lane exit off of the mainline. Third, this situation with the “parking aisle” you are seeing is not a parking aisle, it’s the start of the shoulder for RI 24. |
|
| 185073913 | Standard practice is to map the street between the curbs, not the center line. |
|
| 184791321 | Sorry, but this is incorrect |
|
| 184762417 | It is per the classification guidelines. I’ve noticed you are changing a lot of road classifications lately. I suggest you read over the MA classification guidelines. Most roads are already tagged correctly. |
|
| 181909201 | Street signs mention Blackfan Street. |
|
| 181909201 | Hello,
|
|
| 183720158 | Street sign says private street. |
|
| 183696724 | See access=* |
|
| 183666040 | access=bus is not a valid tag |
|
| 182486313 | This is not a motorway. |
|
| 183330900 | I’ll add the curbs back, but Mapbox satellite aligns better with GPS trace here. |
|
| 182527044 | It’s all done now, been fixed |
|
| 183263752 | Hello, in this changeset you have created overlapping ways that cause routing issues. |
|
| 183273936 | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. As seen on OSM wiki, roads that lead to a bus depot should be tagged highway=service + access=no + bus=yes |
|
| 183273492 | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. |
|
| 182940136 | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. |
|
| 183232290 | ||
| 183232290 | Yes it does |
|
| 183210069 | This is not a secondary road per https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?filters=eyJDTEFTUyI6WzEsNl0sIkZfQ0xBU1MiOlszLDNdfQ%3D%3D&location=42.377309%2C-71.028930%2C17 |