Nope, it’s been blocked off and pedestrian signals removed, i’ve mapped the new crosswalk locations as under construction.

Route 23 should be secondary, i’ll make this change

West of Auburn is fine, exit 11 on 395.

Please see this discussion from 2021 when these guidelines were established.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/2021-May/000687.html

You’re also not reading everything under the trunk section. It specifically says provides long haul travel between regional population centers, which here are served by exits off I 90.

The 5 miles rule should does not apply in urban areas.

Have you looked at other states? Clearly that is not true. For example in NY, the only parts of US 20 that are trunk are where it is over 5 miles from I 90 or I 88. Additionaly, the part of MA 9 that is trunk within 5 miles of I 90 is all in a very dense area. This stretch is extremely isolated. And your part about 90 being closed and that the alternative should be trunk is wrong, classification guidelines clearly state the alternative route should be primary. Secondly, the main alternative east of 290/395 is MA 9, not US 20.

You’re using offensive language and are creating an edit war. Numerous other editors are also questioning your edits in the slack. Your edits are incorrect per the state guidelines and national guidelines for OSM. If you continue this there may be consequences.

See slides 10 and 11

https://files.aptuitivcdn.com/GB7r14nbKy-1182/docs/ComDev/Presentation-Con-Com_Revere-Roundabout_2.18.2025-1.pdf

Sorry, but you keep creating an edit war here with editors that are familiar with the current reconstruction of this area. The edits you keep making to this road is incorrect per city and state documents regarding the project, as well as the city GIS. As I have told you before, MassGIS is not updated very often.

Slip lanes are to be tagged as links per osm.wiki/Highway_link

Additionally, roads that don’t show up on the state GIS map should be mapped as highway=service and names should be pulled from there as well.

https://www.rigis.org/datasets/e-911-road-centerlines

https://planning.ri.gov/planning-areas/transportation/highway-functional-classification

https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?location=41.967385%2C-71.416132%2C8

https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/news/traffic/2023/07/09/crash-route-6-sunday-off-cape-driving-leads-backups-traffic/70395624007/

https://www.google.com/search?q=route+6+cape+cod+bollards&sca_esv=fa9b82bc780cd223&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS1194US1194&hl=en-US&udm=2&biw=420&bih=712&sxsrf=APpeQntkmAO9eos5b_mK3NLONkoCNI7fiQ%3A1784255470443&ei=7pNZatPUGtqfw8cP_-fsUQ&oq=route+6+cape+cod+bollards&gs_lp=EhJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWciGXJvdXRlIDYgY2FwZSBjb2QgYm9sbGFyZHMyCBAAGIAEGKIEMggQABiiBBiJBUifHlDbCFjZHXABeACQAQGYAVygAZIGqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgugAtMFwgIHECMYJxjJAsICBRAAGIAEwgIGEAAYBxgewgIIEAAYCBgKGB7CAgUQIRirApgDAIgGAZIHAjExoAftGLIHAjEwuAfSBcIHBTEuOS4xyAcQgAgA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img#sv=CAMSZBoyKhBlLXJIbU9veGFvOTd2Q3lNMg5ySG1Pb3hhbzk3dkN5TToOUmE1M1FXaFdtWDNDeE0gBCokCg5HeUg0UlgxQXI1RXd0TRIQZS1ySG1Pb3hhbzk3dkN5TRgAMAFKBAgBEAIYByDLn6WNCUoIEAIYASACKAE

Here is an article showing them

I don’t know, but i have driven this road many times and there are bollards all along it.

And you still need to start a discussion before changing a borderline case from motorway as mentioned in the US Highway classification guide.

Also the bollards in the median are currently being replaced with a concrete barrier.

It has bollards between the carriageways.

This is incorrect per the state map.