Hello! Welcome to the OSM community! Curious if you were trying to mark the building in the park as demolished? If so I would recommend keeping the area there and tagging it with demolished:building=yes so other mappers know the building has been demolished despite it still being on the satellite imagery. It also looks like there's a large amenity=park region encompassing a significant area around Alaska Street Park. Is this a mistake? Apologies for the small novel, I'm happy to do some cleanup if its a bit technical with the tagging and all, just want to make sure what I do is accurate to what folks are seeing on the ground. Thanks so much for helping out with the map!

- Benjamin

So, correct me if I'm mistaken on this, but I looked at this and thought that it was mistagged as full on cycle track(see Key:cycleway on the Wiki as linked below), which is a distinctly different element from cycle lanes. The thought process here is twofold: Firstly, trying to standardize how we mark bicycle lanes that aren't separated from the main highway by any barriers and secondly, It could improve way-finding if you're navigating on a bicycle using OSM data. I referenced this section when making the change: cycleway=*#Dedicated_cycle_lanes

If you have any thoughts on this I'd love to talk about it! Thanks!