Likewise, there is no way to read the minds of the "OSM community" when the docs are fragmented and at times at odds with themselves. 7 years ago I brought in the data a few blocks at a time, hardly a mass import. And only for my own small neighborhood, not the whole city. Every time my contributions get erased, it's because of a dubious "community consensus" that doesn't help add anything to the map. Might get around to commenting on this on numerous other mass deletions. Might not.

"community consensus". Wish that could have been expressed before I spent the time on it, and before it was part of the map of my neighborhood for years. This is among the reasons why I mostly don't contribute anymore.

went to a lot of trouble to put those in. perhaps you would like to pay for my time.

Please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139759320

Change it back please.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139759316

Change it back.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139759300

This looks to be a mass edit that changes how the locals want it portrayed. Are you from here? what's the story?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139759288

Thank you for your addition of information that these are pivot irrigation. Would you please consider changing the landuse back to meadow so that these show up better on the map?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139758148

in your zealousness to fix the multipolygon, looks like you undid one of the park parcels? that triangle shape east of the right of way is park owned land.

I'll let you big brains decide.

Please do not revert. This is a work in progress. The data I am bringing in is from King County and has the accurate border. I am in the process of deleting the old Tiger-source boundary in sections which is why the old line is broken in places.

I didn't know, fixed them, thanks!