Hi boeleman81,

I am a member of Lyft's OSM mapping team which added these cycleway tags on Oregon Expressway. We added these tags based on this source: http://vtaorgcontent.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/Site_Content/BikewaysMapA.pdf which indicates that bicycles are permitted on this street. We also added them based on the fact that there is a cycleway route relation on Oregon Expressway, and in addition there are painted lines on the side of the road.

Based on this information, we feel that the cycleway tags should be added back to Oregon Expressway. If you have any thoughts or further concerns regarding this, please let us know.

Best,
cdruck

Thanks for taking care of that! I will let you know if I come across anything else.

Best,
Chris

Thanks for getting on this so quickly! I did a quick look around the area and I did see that there are still a handful of nodes (though not as dense as before) south of El Camino along the city boundary. This string of nodes that I still see are between these 2 nodes: node/6374728474 and node/6374728531
Other than that, it looks good! Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!
-Chris

Hi stevea,

I'm not sure if you noticed, but I think something glitched with this changeset. There is a huge chunk of unattached points with no tags along a portion of the Palo Alto city boundary. I'm not sure what went wrong, but I thought I should bring this to your attention. Here is a node id for one of them for reference: node/6374728376

Meant to say added speed bump.

Added parking lane tags.

WRONG COMMENT AGAIN. Should say added STREET CROSSING, NOT STOP SIGN.

Changeset comment is incorrect. Should say added stop sign and associated tags.

Changeset comment is not correct. I meant to say that I split the way and added the lane count. Also deleted an unnecessary segment of the way.