Looks good to me!

OSMCha can't display what the relation changes were; they also left a note that was just "Your note is public." Note 4988891

I reverted this because the buildings are still visible in the Winter 2024 imagery.

osm.org/changeset/172816602

I reverted this because the buildings are still visible in the Winter 2024 imagery.

osm.org/changeset/172816602

Hey there, thanks for your contribution. One minor point to improve for the future -- you've glued the camera POI to the sidewalk. Try zooming in further to make the node distinct, or use StreetComplete which will never glue a "Thing" to a Way.

I reverted this change, name=access is never correct and the previous road names look legitimate. Additionally, driveways are approximately destination access by default and don't need access tags unless there's something special. If you're sure this is correct, please also tag the physical barriers that make these roads truly private access (this seems unlikely due to how South Drive is laid out).

osm.org/changeset/172815616

Hey there, thanks for your first contribution! This all looks good to me.

name=access is incorrect, just make them service roads (driveways?) with no name. The previous names look correct, I'm reverting all the names that look like they were good data.

Just submitted #172511124 which makes all gates except the delivery gates hgv restricted and gate 4 allow non-hgv deliveries.

I was also considering tagging them as `hgv` instead of `delivery` since observation indicates the rules are mostly enforced for heavy trucks.

Hello, I have effectively reverted this in osm.org/changeset/172467953 by putting in the restrictions according to the signs posted on the gates. Can you verify that all buildings are still routable after my change?