Forgot to mention this is based on note #4707855; I'm used to it showing up in closed:note

Fixed the very close points warning.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172947141

Looks all good to me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173067123

You forgot to update your changeset comment :)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173064661

This is a failed upload; reverted in 173066845

Thanks - couldn't tell what street it was on from the station :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172984036

You also realigned a way in this changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173014505

Hey there, don't see anything particularly wrong with this change.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173027323

Hey there, you made a couple mistakes on this, like adding `parking:right` to a node. Can you go through and try to fix them? Preferably, use the desktop editor JOSM for edits this large to reduce mistakes. https://osmcha.org/changesets/173027501

Looks good to me!

OSMCha can't display what the relation changes were; they also left a note that was just "Your note is public." note/4988891

I reverted this because the buildings are still visible in the Winter 2024 imagery.

changeset/172816602

I reverted this because the buildings are still visible in the Winter 2024 imagery.

changeset/172816602

Hey there, thanks for your contribution. One minor point to improve for the future -- you've glued the camera POI to the sidewalk. Try zooming in further to make the node distinct, or use StreetComplete which will never glue a "Thing" to a Way.

I reverted this change, name=access is never correct and the previous road names look legitimate. Additionally, driveways are approximately destination access by default and don't need access tags unless there's something special. If you're sure this is correct, please also tag the physical barriers that make these roads truly private access (this seems unlikely due to how South Drive is laid out).

changeset/172815616

Hey there, thanks for your first contribution! This all looks good to me.

name=access is incorrect, just make them service roads (driveways?) with no name. The previous names look correct, I'm reverting all the names that look like they were good data.

Just submitted #172511124 which makes all gates except the delivery gates hgv restricted and gate 4 allow non-hgv deliveries.

I was also considering tagging them as `hgv` instead of `delivery` since observation indicates the rules are mostly enforced for heavy trucks.

Hello, I have effectively reverted this in changeset/172467953 by putting in the restrictions according to the signs posted on the gates. Can you verify that all buildings are still routable after my change?