Please refer to official source at: http://parramattalightrail.nsw.gov.au/map/parramatta

I've updated the turn restrictions here because the OsmAnd navigation was giving me illegal directions. I'm no expert but it seems like removing some of the nodes where the roads cross would greatly simplify the intersection and remove the need for many of the turn restrictions.

Editing the node turn restrictions has also changed a bunch of the relations like bus routes - hopefully I haven't broken anything here.

Oh, sorry. I see what you mean. It was the "leisure=fitness_station" tag on the nodes that was the problem, not the nodes themselves. This was from picking it in the iD editor node type dropdown/autocomplete. I incorrectly presumed bare points was bad.

Okay thanks for the tip and thanks for cleaning up after my newbie error! I did read the linked article at the time, but the nuance of the quoted statement was lost on me. I read the first paragraph of it and assumed it meant individual stations should be individually mapped within the region.

No worries, I'll revert the few I've added and adjust the MapRoulette task. It's not public, it was just one I threw together as an experiment when I noticed the suburb markers didn't have the wikidata tag.

Query used was:
(
// query part for: “node and wikidata=*! and place=suburb”
node["wikidata"!~".*"]["place"="suburb"]({{bbox}});
);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;

Ahh okay, I'll put those in from now on, thanks. A novice question you might be able to help with: the LPI NSW imagery is of a higher quality than other sources, but it seems like a lot of building polygons are misaligned according to it. Is moving the polygons to match the LPI NSW imagery acceptable, or is there some nuance here I'm missing?

Thanks for the tip! I was using the StreetComplete app on Android to fill them in, and it just asks for a name so I put this in. I'll tidy up the ones I've done by moving the number into the ref tag, but StreetComplete might start asking for a name again.