blackboxlogic's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
96251349	almost 5 years ago	When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name.
95876686	almost 5 years ago	When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name.
96022305	almost 5 years ago	You put the name "Grant Lane Private" on this road, probably because the street sign says "Grant LN PVT". I've fixed it to "Grant Lane". When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name. I have not reviewed your other changes to see if you made this same mistake other places. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96022305
96689989	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions. I've reviews them and they look good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96689989
96699248	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96699248
96667487	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to osm and thanks for your contributions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96667487
96434399	almost 5 years ago	I forgot to say: thank you for your contributions and hope you don't mind some gentle guidance. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96434399
96434399	almost 5 years ago	You're tagging these roads as access=private which means "you're not legally allowed to be here". That's useful if there is a gate, fence, or a sign that says "you're not legally allowed to be here". I frequently see people misusing the tag for property which is privately owned, but in Maine you CAN legally go on privately owned property unless specifically told otherwise (by a gate or sign). I haven't personally been to these locations so I don't know the situation, but if there isn't a sign or a gate, it would be more appropriate to use the tag "ownership=private" to indicate that they are privately owned, and leave the access tag empty. If you feel the need to place an access tag on privately owned properties which don't have gates or signs, they would be access=permissive. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96434399
95978788	almost 5 years ago	FYI you deleted "Harvest Lane" (WAY: 826293287) and put "Dawe Road" (WAY: 885770421) in its place, but this is definitely Harvest Lane. I've fixed it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95978788
96430764	almost 5 years ago	Consider combining many similar small edits into a single changeset so it is easier to review. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96430764
96419557	almost 5 years ago	This area has undergone recent construction and was correct as mapped. I've fixed it in changeset/96434704, this time with a note and a noexit tag to make that clear. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96419557
96344409	almost 5 years ago	I see you've set name=COPE on WAY: 887943449. This looks like it might be a last name which is personal information that doesn't belong on a public map. If this is the name of a business or something else, could you provide more details about what this element is? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96344409
96284175	almost 5 years ago	What's your intent behind way/887678680? Are you planning on coming back and cleaning it up? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96284175
96212733	almost 5 years ago	Thanks for mapping cross walks. It would be much easier to review your work if you grouped many similar changes into one changeset. That is the purpose of changesets. osm.wiki/Changeset --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96212733
96153172	almost 5 years ago	FYI setting 'access=private' gets applied to each specific mode of transportation unless explicitly overridden. So it is not necessary to ALSO specify that, for example, horses may not go here. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96153172
96147614	almost 5 years ago	regarding node/7231473006, do you prefer to keep points of interest (in this case, a business) separate from the building elements that they are in? Would you recommend this to others? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96147614
96117953	almost 5 years ago	Thank you for your edit. Heads up, we don't use abbreviations in roads names in OSM and I've updated this to Echo Hill Road.
96115702	almost 5 years ago	Gone: #96119885
95709033	almost 5 years ago	Ok, so... I've adjusted city names and zip codes based on the 2010 Census Zip Code Tabulation Area for zip 04926 from https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/tigerweb/. See my changes here: changeset/96116988 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95709033
96095518	almost 5 years ago	Guy Dude. It was still there. There were many traffic signal nodes stacked on top of each other, and none of those roads were actually connected. Fixed in #96115370. Also, is Deering Avenue (from the north west) suppose to connect to the intersection?