blackboxlogic's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
97605532	almost 5 years ago	I checked the website you linked as a reference: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/88687705 and the name of this place doesn't have the word "Historical" in it. I also checked the wikipedia page and the name doesn't have the word "Historical" in it. I'm changing the names of these element to reflect the references I found. If you want to change them back, please provide a published reference showing that name. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605532
97508861	almost 5 years ago	Your edits would be much easier to review if you made many similar changes in the same changeset. I see two other users have requested the same thing from you. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97508861
97467253	almost 5 years ago	It seems unlikely that this building is named "private". I've changed them. If you want to change them back, please include a reference to where you found that name published. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97467253
97467205	almost 5 years ago	Seems odd to have addr: tags but not have addr:housenumber. I've made an adjustment here by merging the building with the address node. changeset/97587532 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97467205
97336477	almost 5 years ago	I added an address node. You added a building with the same address in the same place (which is far better). Instead of having two elements with the same address, please feel free to delete the address node as it isn't needed any longer (as long as the address details are on the new building). Please ask if you have questions. And welcome to OSM - Alex --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97336477
97335188	almost 5 years ago	HI, thanks for your edits. You named way/894430736 "Owned by Town of Wells" but that doesn't sound like a name. Maybe consider "owner=Town of Wells" instead? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97335188
97257074	almost 5 years ago	Hi, thanks for adding buildings. In 2020, I added all the address nodes in Maine, but the buildings you're adding are much better. Any time you add a building, consider merging it with the address node so the node is gone and the address details are on the building. Please ask if you have questions. - Alex --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97257074
97176534	almost 5 years ago	regarding "St. Stephen Drive", why not "Saint..."? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97176534
97114518	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to OSM and thank you for your much-needed improvements to Denmark roads. Please ask if you have any questions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97114518
96922890	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to OSM! I've reviewed your first few edits and they look great! Please ask if you have questions. -Alex --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96922890
96823854	almost 5 years ago	You deleted WAY: 822682396 (replacing it with WAY: 891343294) which has less information. Since the satellite imagery is old, I can't tell if that building really no longer exists. Please only delete things from OSM if they don't exist in the real world. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96823854
96823854	almost 5 years ago	Looks like you drew a new way (WAY: 891343293) over an existing way (duplicating it). My best guess is that you were trying to indicate that this way is designed for bikes. I've never been there so I don't know exactly what's going on, but If possible, I would add new properties to existing elements, or use "relations" to group elements into a single larger element (like a bike route). Please ask if you have questions. https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is a great place to get help. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96823854
83748907	almost 5 years ago	Thanks for responding. I seems you were solely responsible for all 3 instances of "posted=yes" in all of OSM. I hope you don't mind that I've updated those to "source:access=sign".
83748907	almost 5 years ago	What do you mean by "posted=yes"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83748907
96783155	almost 5 years ago	Thanks for your edits. This year, I placed all the address nodes but the buildings you're adding are better. When you add a building, consider merging the address node with the building you added (if it's clear which one it belongs to). To merge to things, select them both and press C (for Combine). -Alex --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96783155
96782143	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I've reviewing them and they look great. I think you may have intention only a portion of this to be a culvert? osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=891024392 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96782143
96750222	almost 5 years ago	Yep, just confirming. Based on the satellite imagery, highway=track is more appropriate for many of these roads. Unclassified is somewhere you could use a normal car, probably paved. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96750222
96749201	almost 5 years ago	Some of the roads you've been working on seem like they might be logging roads. Consider: highway=track? -Alex --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96749201
96737845	almost 5 years ago	Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. We expand abbreviations in names. This one has already been corrected from "Ice House Ln." to "Ice House Lane". --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96737845
95919284	almost 5 years ago	When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name.