Darn, beat me too it.

I forgot to respond to this, I do want to say sorry. I was more hostile then I should have been. Just had some people from not around here come in and mass edit especially a lot of golf mappers and had a bit of a gut reaction. I think this is mostly all fine I can correct anything small with sidewalks with biking permitted there is some complexity in that situation with some being recognized bike trails despite not being a wider then a regular sidewalk really, and I have kept things the way I did partly because it was just how it was here when I started nothing really marked as sidewalks.

You asked for a review, the edits to the Pathfinder look good, the way the road was attached to the water tap I don't believe is correct, I can clean up the roads a bit in that area. As well I think amenity=drinking_water would have been a good tag to add to that public water faucet as I assume this is drinking water?

That is nice sweety.

This has stuff mounted to the top like a typical mast or tower that is not a radiator/antenna its self. It has guying which to my knowledge is the main defining difference between it being a tower.

How is this not tagging for whatever render that is if it is assuming all footways are hiking trails, especially when hiking routes are a thing. My understanding has always been sidewalks are directly attached and along a given road and exclusive to pedestrians, and plenty of stuff curves off away from roads especially on K-State campus, I don't know what all further your planing to do here. Some of these also are areas where bikes are intended to also share it on paths in town. Especially as the city has been widening some and making them multi use trails. For example the one on Anderson going the length of it is endorsed by the city as a place to ride bikes on, seems odd to label it a sidewalk.

Local mapper here in Kansas, a lot of the imports that were done in Topeka over a decade ago were of exceptionally poor quality, duplicate data and the address information was poorly aligned to the point you couldn't tell what house it went to. The import never should have been permitted to happen, removing it and starting clean was agreed to be the most reasonable option

some of these landuses overlap what i would call other landuses grass with clumps of trees ect, also they are overlapping the river in areas, and just not done with the precision to the quality of imagery available. You might want to slow down a bit and take your time

That railway is the old streetcar line, you have just placed a street over the top of the existing mapped streets, please undo this changeset. It is probably stupid that people map railways that don't exist, but people do and it should have been left that way.

A friend of mine was out there just the other day, and I was going to work on the map out there, beat me to it.

Please stop using names as a description, and please engage with the comments on your other edits.

Again, names are not descriptions and you CAN NOT use Google for any kind of information due to copyright

Also if you need help with anything feel free to reach out, it has been some time since I have been in Osborne, I have spent a lot of time mapping out Downs. There is a slack channel for Openstreetmap US osmus.slack.com and there is a channel for Kansas.

you set the name tag as "This looks like a dog house" that is not a name, names are not descriptions. It was also tagged as an animal shelter, this means a shelter as a facility not just a dog house in the back yard.

The wiki has good information on these tags I would make sure you read any wiki page before using that tag so you can understand how it is used.
name=*

amenity=animal_shelter

Darn, you beat me too it, was going to try and get new imagery here soonish so i could do it.

What is your source for this data, your editing all over so this couldn't have been via a survey or anything.

Where the heck did you find a source of tracks, I marked them out based on descriptions s but I have never seen a map in all my years of living in Manhattan, and even then not exactly something i wanted in osm, but curious what source you find for it so i can share it with people.

Hello, glad to see someone else editing here in Manhattan.

There did seem to be a few mistakes in the edit which is fine I certainly made some while starting out. You made an overlapping parking lot in Cisco park, i went ahead and deleted the one with less information the new one you put in had more information which is good. Kimball is a secondary road, primary roads are generally like US highways, even state ones tend to get secondary with the exception of when in urban areas which is why Seth Child is a primary despite being a state route. I went ahead and changed that back.

I do also just have a question about the construction area marked in CiCo, the county still has it marked as park in the GIS system, and i don't recall seeing any announcement about part of the park being rezoned for commercial construction, though I could have missed this. I didn't know if you had any information about that.

This is not right, least not fully right. The signs actually spell it differently at each end, which is more or less why i haven't touched it when i was checking road names a few years ago. It is Skyvue at the north end and Sky Vue at the south east side.

You list "Open Records for Kansas Appraisers" a lot of state data is unclear what copyright it is under and if it can be included in the map based on what i have checked out. What data specifically are you using and what copyright is it under?

Same issue as with your Burger King edit if you search for Dollar General the ID editor will plug in a lot of the information needed.
Will look something like this
"building=yes
name=Dollar General
brand=Dollar General
brand:wikidata=Q145168
shop=variety_store"