baumann3141's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 165086779 | 7 months ago | Thanks for your reply! I agree that for the most part it is not a cycleway, however, if it's changed from cycleway to path the tag "bicycle=designated" needs to be added, otherwise it will not show as a cycling route! Thanks, Thomas. |
| 165086779 | 8 months ago | Hi cmxn, just wanted to ask why you removed the cycling and pedestrian related tags from this and other paths, was that on purpose?
|
| 161872901 | 10 months ago | Hello, I am in the process of updating the Trowbridge exit based on available MDOT information. I might be able to get some GPS traces as well.
|
| 146163792 | almost 2 years ago | Ok, I found I was missing a "backward" tag since the segment points away from the intersection. I corrected this and it appears correct in the JOSM "Lane and road attributes" display now. Let me know if you find a problem! Thanks!
|
| 146125221 | almost 2 years ago | Thanks for your comment! See my reply on way/1238996468#map=19/42.72922/-84.46152!
|
| 146163792 | almost 2 years ago | Hi emersonveenstra, thank you for your comments. I was completely sure about the turn lanes, I will check and correct. The "turn:lanes" doesn't require one-way I think, but I will check. They might appear out of order since the direction of the road segment is away from the intersection. But I will check!
|
| 136631891 | about 2 years ago | I looked at this earlier and I am not sure what you mean with "freeway construction and renders like it". The project is close to completion and hopefully the path opens still in 11/2023. I followed the tagging scheme described here (highway=construction), which discourages the use of "construction:highway=*"
|
| 128712497 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Saginaw St at Marsh Rd and Meijer does not have bike lanes, the shoulders/turn lanes should not be tagged as cycleway=lane, see cycleway=* for reference. |
| 126953991 | over 3 years ago | Yes, thank you!
|
| 126955649 | over 3 years ago | Yes.
|
| 122228611 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for finding that!
|
| 121831788 | over 3 years ago | Please note that Bing aerial images are outdated. The previous edit was based on on-site survey.
|
| 119875729 | over 3 years ago | Yes it can be fixed easily, it's a very small edit. I don't see that it has been fixed yet.
|
| 119875729 | over 3 years ago | Please revert your changes, previous edits were just done a few days ago and reflect reality. Aerial images are out of date. Please check before deleting/changing recent edits! Thanks.
|
| 119520515 | over 3 years ago | Hello tuttiton, yes, they removed the connection to Aurelius and blocked the rest of the roadway. I marked the part that is no longer accessible as "no access". This work was done in connection with the railroad overpass bridge replacement.
|
| 118778209 | almost 4 years ago | Bing imagery is not up to date! The intersection has recently been changed, and the way it was mapped before your edit was correct . Please undo your edit. Please also check if you edit something that was very recently changed in OSM that your information is up to date. If you can't check in the real world, don't just edit it! Thanks!
|
| 118778209 | almost 4 years ago | Bing imagery is out of date! This intersection has been changed and the way it was mapped was correct. Please undo your edit. Also, in the future check the real world before making changes like this! Thanks!
|
| 117707647 | almost 4 years ago | Note: correct comment should be "corrected cycle lane tagging and crosswalk tags on Farm Ln"
|
| 116046586 | almost 4 years ago | It would be better to upload the edits in different places into separate changesets, this makes it easier for others to review!
|
| 116042264 | almost 4 years ago | I don't know what editor you are using. I think you might be hiding map features as you edit, so you don't get the full picture of what you are changing. I am not sure how you deleted a feature like the fence (and that's just four nodes or so) w/o noticing, but it's kind of scary. I suggest doing some really simple additions first before attempting changing existing complex features. I use JOSM and always go through the validation and check what I am uploading. If something doesn't look right I cancel and check again. Everybody makes mistakes sometimes, though! I suggest you join the next meeting of the OSM Michigan group and we can discuss workflows with other more experienced users! Please check the wiki page for more mapping tips and information: osm.wiki/Michigan
|