OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
165086779 7 months ago

Thanks for your reply! I agree that for the most part it is not a cycleway, however, if it's changed from cycleway to path the tag "bicycle=designated" needs to be added, otherwise it will not show as a cycling route! Thanks, Thomas.

165086779 8 months ago

Hi cmxn, just wanted to ask why you removed the cycling and pedestrian related tags from this and other paths, was that on purpose?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165086779

161872901 10 months ago

Hello, I am in the process of updating the Trowbridge exit based on available MDOT information. I might be able to get some GPS traces as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161872901

146163792 almost 2 years ago

Ok, I found I was missing a "backward" tag since the segment points away from the intersection. I corrected this and it appears correct in the JOSM "Lane and road attributes" display now. Let me know if you find a problem! Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146163792

146125221 almost 2 years ago

Thanks for your comment! See my reply on way/1238996468#map=19/42.72922/-84.46152!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146125221

146163792 almost 2 years ago

Hi emersonveenstra, thank you for your comments. I was completely sure about the turn lanes, I will check and correct. The "turn:lanes" doesn't require one-way I think, but I will check. They might appear out of order since the direction of the road segment is away from the intersection. But I will check!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146163792

136631891 about 2 years ago

I looked at this earlier and I am not sure what you mean with "freeway construction and renders like it". The project is close to completion and hopefully the path opens still in 11/2023. I followed the tagging scheme described here (highway=construction), which discourages the use of "construction:highway=*"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136631891

128712497 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Saginaw St at Marsh Rd and Meijer does not have bike lanes, the shoulders/turn lanes should not be tagged as cycleway=lane, see cycleway=* for reference.

126953991 over 3 years ago

Yes, thank you!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126953991

126955649 over 3 years ago

Yes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126955649

122228611 over 3 years ago

Thanks for finding that!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122228611

121831788 over 3 years ago

Please note that Bing aerial images are outdated. The previous edit was based on on-site survey.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121831788

119875729 over 3 years ago

Yes it can be fixed easily, it's a very small edit. I don't see that it has been fixed yet.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119875729

119875729 over 3 years ago

Please revert your changes, previous edits were just done a few days ago and reflect reality. Aerial images are out of date. Please check before deleting/changing recent edits! Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119875729

119520515 over 3 years ago

Hello tuttiton, yes, they removed the connection to Aurelius and blocked the rest of the roadway. I marked the part that is no longer accessible as "no access". This work was done in connection with the railroad overpass bridge replacement.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119520515

118778209 almost 4 years ago

Bing imagery is not up to date! The intersection has recently been changed, and the way it was mapped before your edit was correct . Please undo your edit. Please also check if you edit something that was very recently changed in OSM that your information is up to date. If you can't check in the real world, don't just edit it! Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118778209

118778209 almost 4 years ago

Bing imagery is out of date! This intersection has been changed and the way it was mapped was correct. Please undo your edit. Also, in the future check the real world before making changes like this! Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118778209

117707647 almost 4 years ago

Note: correct comment should be "corrected cycle lane tagging and crosswalk tags on Farm Ln"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117707647

116046586 almost 4 years ago

It would be better to upload the edits in different places into separate changesets, this makes it easier for others to review!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116046586

116042264 almost 4 years ago

I don't know what editor you are using. I think you might be hiding map features as you edit, so you don't get the full picture of what you are changing. I am not sure how you deleted a feature like the fence (and that's just four nodes or so) w/o noticing, but it's kind of scary. I suggest doing some really simple additions first before attempting changing existing complex features. I use JOSM and always go through the validation and check what I am uploading. If something doesn't look right I cancel and check again. Everybody makes mistakes sometimes, though! I suggest you join the next meeting of the OSM Michigan group and we can discuss workflows with other more experienced users! Please check the wiki page for more mapping tips and information: osm.wiki/Michigan
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116042264