thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the changes based on the Bing Ariel imagery. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality. I request you to go ahead and make the necessary changes or let me know with the required modifications. always happy to learn from the community

Hi Someone Else,
I have traced the road based on Esri World Imagery, However i have realized that i missed checking OS open data which would have helped me avoid the offset created. Thanks for looking into my edit. Happy to learn from community and i will take this as a learning for my future edits

thanks for checking into our edits. I have created the road based on bing since it is clear and the road skeleton is same as the latest iamgery. Post your suggestion, I realised that it is sligtly misaligned with the atest imagery. Please find the changeset(86129276) for the suggested modifications. i will take this as a learning from the community and reflect it in my future edits. thanks for the suggestion. always happy to learn from the community

I would like to thank you for verifying my edits. I have made this edit based on the driver feedback and available resources. I havent extended the road as the imagery was unclear and looks like a blockage near the building. Please find the changeset(85913932) for suggested modifications. thanks for the improvements. looking forward for more insights from the community

Hi Andy,

The motor_vehicle tag was added based on vehicles present in the satellite imagery. Based on this source the motor_vehicle = yes tag was added to this road. As per community feedback reverted the access tag changes.

Changeset: 71731892

Please let me know if there are any other suggestions

Regards,
Bashwith