OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
151974953

Will start using the BDOrtho IGN imagery and fix the alignment issues again...

151974953

Hey divaddivag, the alignment was only done 10m circumference off the node: node/11941542944 and since the path (way/958256696#map=14/49.3891/-0.9387) was moved ever so slightly on the eastern side, the changeset looks bigger than it should be. Will hike it the next couple of days to get a better GPX reading and we can conclude after that if a reversion is needed.

139943462

okay good to know, I knew there was some way to do it without the relation

139943462

relation/16213234

139943462

Thanks for catching that, was hoping that building:part=yes would suffice, though seems like I still needed to create a relation and add a parent. It should be fixed now.

126717253

Danke, habe wohl vergessen zu überprüfen ob es schon existiert

137215038

Danke, mir ist später aufgefallen, dass ich das falsche Tag benutzt habe, aber bin noch nicht dazugekommen alle Instanzen up zu daten.

127177349

Sers seewälder, bis jetzt gibt es keine Änderungen und stimme dazu das 'proposed' eher besser ist.

133728072

It's more of a tourist attraction than really a roof. Technically it can be used as a shelter, though it's not its intended purpose.

128565786

comment should be: update lengths of shops

114762344

Hey, it seems like you dropped the SAC scale from T3 to T2 for way/113340334.
Recently did the hike and wouldn't agree. Can you explain what source you were referencing?

124451990

The only reason it is big is that on the same upload two small changes were added. Confused why StreetComplete did it that way...

120122994

cool danke

120122994

gibt es im nachhinein den history aus zu bessern?

120122994

Probiere meistens den Lösungsweg zu nehmen, solange die Änderungen nicht zu schwer/nervig machbar sind. Vielleicht sollte ich höheren Priorität setzen auf schon ältere Gebäuden (zumindens Versionsgeschichte mäßig).

120122994

sollte mit diesen Changeset verbessert sein: changeset/120175488

120062777

Danke für den Hinweis. Habe sie schon verbessert.

115898410

Referenced the wrong building off their website

114161027

Genau, also Rathaus is wieder am früheren Standort, aber immer noch teilweise Baustelle.