No, my mistake. All fixed.

Thanks, all fixed.

Sorry, the source is the Environment Canterbury imagery.

Yes, I'll have to have a think about which reverts I could safely revert. I know other users have made changes in some of the areas I previously mapped.

Yep, I'm aware that ECan pass their imagery to LINZ, and there is certainly a lag. There is quite a bit of development going on at the moment in the area I've been mapping. One reason why ECan's service was attractive in the first place!

That's awesome, thanks for doing that. Now, a silly question: can I un-revert some of my reverted changesets?

That's excellent, thanks. Yes, I've reverted my changesets. I had trouble resolving conflicts with a couple of the earlier ones, mostly because I'm never sure how to do it well. Looking at the map, though, I don't see any glaring problems with the geometries.

I'm sure you'll kindly tell me how to do that too.

Warin61: I did not respond because I did not see your messages until today. As you know, it's a busy time of year. ECan's imagery is published as a web service under CC BY 3.0 NZ---I had thought that that was sufficient permission but I've since been made aware that it may not be in itself. I'll stop using the imagery.

You're correct, it should be Josephine street. I didn't notice that. I'll change the street names.

Hi. I typically map the entrances and exits as divided ways in order to make it clear that they're one way. I agree that the junction in question is a bit clunky, and strictly speaking probably should just be tagged as a mini_roundabout instead of a full roundabout.