atuito's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 118354166 | Hi, just to clarify - there is in fact pedestrian access around the south side of the motorway junction at Clevedon, but I think your changes are okay as the separate footpath remains unchanged. Best wishes. |
|
| 111246272 | Hi Russ, thanks for all your power mapping today! I believe what you've added as a pipeline here might actually be the underground cables for the Hinkley Point Connection (more info here: https://hinkleyconnection.co.uk/map-and-timeline/). Take a look and let me know what you think. Best wishes. |
|
| 105241156 | Hi foxysrider, Did you determine this track was private based on a current survey? I believe it's a designated bridleway, so access=private wouldn't be correct here. Many thanks, atuito |
|
| 105233732 | Hi foxysrider, I'm not sure the access tags you've changed here are quite right - footway implies that it's designated for pedestrians, but you've added bicycle=designated as well. I'm also not sure if access=no is necessary here, implies it isn't open to the general public. Many thanks, atuito |
|
| 105241026 | Hi foxysrider, Did you do a survey to determine this is a footway not a track? Many thanks, atuito |
|
| 105235910 | Hi foxysrider, I see you've converted this parking aisle to a cycleway with access tags for motor vehicles & pedestrians.
Many thanks,
|
|
| 105235986 | Hi foxysrider, welcome to OSM! I see you've changed the permissions for this track to access=no, however I don't think that's quite right. The general public can currently walk along the track, as well as cyclists/horse riders I believe, so access=no has stopped routing for these other modes of transport. Additionally, access=no changes the rendering to a desaturated/greyed out look, the same as the tracks to the south which are in fact private, so this change is likely to create confusion about which paths are open to the public. Many thanks,
|