Hi Rajeswari

Thanks for adding

Hi Reena,

Welcome to OSM,

may i know why way/528229032 has been removed from database

Hi Sowmya,

Welcome to OSM, thanks for contribution

Hi Sowmya,

Thanks for making the changes as per the ground.

Hi Andy Prasetya,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this area, I observed that some of the buildings such as: way/1037713268,way 1037713269,way 1037713270,way 1037713271,way 103771327 are not matching with any of the imageries (including Bing, as mentioned in the changeset comment) but the buildings also have additional information such as having height and level information. Would you mind sharing the sources used to add these buildings and information on the same?

Regards
Manoj

Hi Elissa,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this area, I observed that some of the buildings such as: way/1035080532,way 1035080505,way 1035080527,way 1035080511,way 1035080369, way/1035080368, are not matching with any of the satellite imageries. Would you mind sharing the sources used to create these buildings?

Regards
Manoj

Hi ripti,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this area, I observed that some of the buildings such as: way/1038144702,way 1038144690
way/1038144701,way 1038144687,way 1038144688,way 1038144700,way 1038144686 overlapping/created duplicates. Could you please recheck this data around this region and correct it

Regards
Manoj

Hi TagaSanPedroAko,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that some of the ways such as way/1037270950,way 83146430,way 1037270949,way 83146428 are created as untagged and service ways instead of motorway_link. As per OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Highway_link) these connectors between motorways should be marked as motorway_link. Please do look into it and let us know if you think otherwise.

Regards
Manoj

Hi Dasmarinas,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in Manila, I observed that some of the roads such as: way/29256451 way/60012588 way/696097621 are added with the street name suffix as “Street” in Mandaluyong city(Eg: Mariveles as Mariveles Street). We would like to know if there is any source/Image to add “street” as suffix

Regards
Manoj

Hi Bùi Khắc Tú ,

Trusting you are doing well!
As informed I have modified the tertiary highways.

Happy Mapping
Manoj

Hi Bùi Khắc Tú ,

Trusting you are doing well!
Thank you for adding the highways using the GPS as a source @https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=19.7380798%2C%20105.8813002#map=17/19.73717/105.88171

Would you mind also sharing the source for adding the classification to these roads? As these groups of road cannot be tertiary, For the best way of mapping, kindly refer to highway wiki highway=* .
We will go ahead and change them to residential as the area is still under development and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

Happy Mapping
Manoj

Hello Theary MORK,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap! While mapping in Cambodia we have observed that landuse=residential polygons were created as continuous polygon tracing each rooftop of the building with “ name**=*. For best mapping practice we need to create an individual building polygon for every rooftop and tag “building=yes” refer: building=* for more information.

And also would you mind sharing the source for adding “name” information to the landuse polygons and the geometry of the buildings does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and this should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

Please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/

Happy Mapping!
Manoj.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115383543

Hello pedroky,

Trust you are doing well!
While mapping in the Perean Kangin Village we observed that a few of the mapped residential roads were deleted. Would you mind sharing the source for deleting the roads in this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115115897/?

Thank you, looking forward to hearing from you.

Happy Mapping
Manoj

Hi andi9876,

Trust you are doing well,

Referring to the node/8956906069
At this junction, the connection needs to be fixed as the highways are intersecting in reality and this is also leading to a validation error. It is suggested that adding restrictions at the intersection is the best way of mapping, kindly refer to the restrictions page osm.wiki/Relation:restriction

And also for the usage of keeping ‘independent note’ seems like it's a practice to use these guidelines note=*. As a suggestion, you can use an individual OSM note or add it as a part of the actual tag for easy discoverability. You can refer to this https://blog.mapbox.com/interacting-with-the-local-mapping-community-using-openstreetmap-notes-1088686c88d5 for dropping notes and fixing them.

Looking forward to hearing from you on fixing the connection.

Happy Mapping,
Manoj

Hi Muhammad Murtadha,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap. While mapping in Indonesia we observed that you have added a lot of building polygons which does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

We know it’s often scary for a beginner to map in OSM, please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ or reach out to us for more questions.

Happy Mapping!
Manoj
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114449515

Hi Athilla08,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap. While mapping in Indonesia we observed that you have added a lot of building polygons which does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

We know it’s often scary for a beginner to map in OSM, please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ or reach out to us for more questions.

Happy Mapping!
Manoj
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114542709

Hi lingkungan18nadyana,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap. While mapping in Indonesia we observed that you have added a lot of building polygons which does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

We know it’s often scary for a beginner to map in OSM, please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ or reach out to us for more questions.

Happy Mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114562327

Hi Firman Fathur Rochman,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap. While mapping in Indonesia we observed that you have mapped a lot of invalid buildings / land use polygons which do not reflect on the ground reality and need to be avoided on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets (@Firman%20Fathur%20Rochman/history#map=11/-6.9192/107.2284) and please reach out to us for any questions.

We know it’s often scary for a beginner to map in OSM, please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ or reach out to us for more questions.

Happy Mapping !

Hi Jinal
Hi fauziah rizka,

Trust you are doing well!

While mapping in Palangkaraya we have noticed “ford=yes” tags at every highway junction on multiple nodes and would you mind sharing the source of "ford=yes" tags which were used in osm.org/#map=18/-2.622132/111.746098 or https://osmcha.org/changesets/91904689

Looking forward to hear from you.

Happy Mapping!
Thanks & Regards
Manoj