Vil foreslå du tagger således:

"name"="MTB-sporet i Hareskovene" -
"old_name"="Det Røde Spor"

Cement er (også) et engelsk ord https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cement. Dog næppe det rette. Cement er et element i beton (concrete), og jeg gætter på her er tale om en betonbelægning

Mon du forsøgte at skrive Alléen i stedet for Alle'en?

...hvorfor?

Det er næsten korrekt hvad du skriver. Kontroltårnet er bemande af civile flyveledere, ikke af forsvaret. Dog er det vist godt nok forsvaret, som ejer bygningen.

Tillader mig at rette tilbage her, da den officielle bredde på banen altså er 22.5 meter (https://aim.naviair.dk/media/files/hym0bygendn/EK_AD_2_EKYT_en.pdf)

Karup er et fint eksempel på noget tilsvarende: relation/7145862#map=13/56.3083/9.0987

Men nu har du også medtaget hele Flyvestation Aalborg i arealet. Det er jo ikke det samme som Aalborg Lufthavn (som egentlig stort set kun er selve terminalbygningen)

OSM is not a historical map. If you wish to create a map of historic airfield (which is absolutely interesting; I am an aviator myself) - OSM is NOT the place to do it. osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

For the sake of keeping the discussion in one place, I will quote what I replied to jan_olieslagers in a private message:

"Because “Former Airstrip at Bodilster” is NOT the name of this place, just like “Closed Netto” is not the name of a building that used to house a Netto store. Unless there is a signpost on site, or locals commonly use a specific name, then an area simply has no name, and none should be defined. See: osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag

The disused prefix is used for objects “that are in a reasonable state of repair but which are currently unused” (quote from the wiki). Since the runway has been physically removed, saying that it is in a reasonable state of repair is wrong. The removed prefix is commonly used in Denmark for objects that have been permanently removed. See: disused=*:

Besides, OSM is not a place to map historical features. Only current features that exist and can be verified if you go (physically) to the place in question should be mapped. The only reason to keep the runway in the database (with the removed tag) is to prevent someone from adding it again by mistake as long as it is still visible in some aerial imagery (although, if you use updated imagery of Denmark, it is already gone). When aerial imagery is updated, the runway should be removed completely. Again, OSM is a map of current features, not a historical map. See: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features"

Tjo det kunne også være en løsning

Please do not merge address nodes with buildings when editing in Denmark.

Du skal ikke bruge maxspeed når der er tale om en anbefalet hastighedsgrænse (altså en blå, firkantet tavle: http://www.trafikgummi.dk/trafikgummi.dk/images/billeder/Trafik/skilte/E%2053.gif). Her skal du i stedet bruges "maxspeed:advisory". Bemærk at maxspeed her stadig skal være 50 !!

Reverted: changeset/65740929

Reverted due to vandalism

Ja der er flere kilder, men grundet ophavsret må vi jo vente på at nogle tager ud og konstaterer "med egne øjne" at det er korrekt.

Please note that an address is not the same as a building!! An address can continue to exist even when a building is torn down. All addresses in Denmark are updated automatically, so you should NEVER delete or edit any Danish address.

Please do not touch the Danish address nodes.

Alle adresser i OSM er importerer fra Danmarks Adresseregister. Hvis der er fejl i adressedata, skal du ikke rette fejlen i OSM, men derimod kontakte Ringkøbing-Skjern Kommune, som kan rette fejlen i Danmarks Adresseregister. Så bliver adressen også automatisk rettet i Krak og alle mulige andre tjenester.

Ja jeg så det godt, jeg ved ikke hvorfor det skete på den måde.