I marked areas that are paved with sett. Areas marked with concrete were e.g. stairs and one area of tunnel. I'm not sure which path you are referring to in this changeset, and apologies if I marked a path as concrete that wasn't (or isn't now?), but there's clearly a mix of set / stones / concrete in this change set.

Cheers!

Very nice catch on the incorrectly named street!

BTW: Is adding the postal code, town, and / or province to buildings really worth it? This can be found very easily with a spatial search ("building osm.wiki/Tag:addr:housenumber=... osm.wiki/Tag:addr:street=... IN (boundary osm.wiki/Tag:name=...") and prevents having each and every building tagged with what is ultimately redundant data?

I tend to see the spatial relationships ("building XYZ in boundary type X name Z") as being .. well .. relational :)

Oh, and I double checked against Miami-Dade's open map data as well.

The addresses on the houses, which I then re-confirmed with some online searches for those same addresses.

The comment should be *Centredale* of course. :/ Centreville is elsewhere in the province.

Thanks! That was a search in JOSM that went wrong. Thought I'd cleaned it all up, but missed this multi-polygon.