Hi,

I saw that you deleted the name from this trunk road 437340470. Is the name from TIGER incorrect ?

Thanks,
Armin G

Hello,

I was editing in the area and I saw that you edited the construction tag for the motorway_link. Is the construction of the motorway done ? Also does the way/13235838 still exist ?

Thanks,
Armin G Telenav EU

Hello,

Do the ways 462251368, 462248863 still exist ? I can't find them on the satellite imagery.

Thanks,
Armin G - Telenav EU

Hello,

Thanks for the feedback. I've reverted the changeset.

Thanks,
Armin G
Telenav Europe

Hello,

Ok. Thanks for the correction.

Armin G
Telenav Europe

Thanks for the feedback. I've identified what you are referring to (it was an issue regarding validation tool) and I will keep an eye out for any more of these cases.

Thanks for the feedback. I've started double checking all the road names from Calgary that have been mapped by us.

Thanks for the feedback, I've corrected the suffixes to conform to Calgary standards

Thanks for your feedback. My dataset for road name is from Canvec where there are no numeric prefixes in this area. Could you please highlight which ways are wrong?

Thanks for the feedback. I used the suffix Northwest because this is how the road name in mapped in Canvec, but I will keep in mind that NW, NE, SW & SE is the standard in Calgary.

Thanks for the feedback. I've corrected the links.

Hi,

Is there any update regarding the motorway? Do you know if it's still in construction ?

Hi,

Thanks for the comment . I’ve added a u_turn restriction because of the only_left restriction in the area. Where there is an only type restriction sign, you cannot make an u_turn because the only maneuver you are allowed to make is that left. This is the why I added the implied no_u_turn.

Armin Gheorghina – Telenav Europe